{
  "id": 5462026,
  "name": "Keela McGAHEY v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "McGahey v. State",
  "decision_date": "2005-01-20",
  "docket_number": "CR 04-1041",
  "first_page": "380",
  "last_page": "381",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "360 Ark. 380"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "201 S.W.3d 416"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "359 Ark. 252",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        3712834
      ],
      "weight": 5,
      "year": 2004,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/359/0252-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 175,
    "char_count": 2033,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.776,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.505882454708161e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5222011012997283
    },
    "sha256": "ce978e5e3ca219d0c3354cbaed8a7300a6b8eeb60674760a97f2479262836907",
    "simhash": "1:e385fd65abb5a34f",
    "word_count": 348
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:58:07.617704+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Keela McGAHEY v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Keela McGahey filed a motion for rule on the clerk, which we granted in McGahey v. State, 359 Ark. 252, 195 S.W.3d 922 (2004). In McGahey, we stated that \u201cthe motion and accompanying record fail[ed] to reveal plainly whether there was an attorney\u2019s error,\u201d on the part of appellant\u2019s former counsel, Mr. Jimmy Doyle. We remanded the matter of attorney error to the circuit court to make findings of fact. Id.\nOn November 19, 2004, an order from the Desha County Circuit Court containing those findings was filed with our court. At the hearing, evidence was presented that is consistent with McGahey, supra, where we stated:\nOn May 15,2003, the court reporter forwarded a letter to Mr. Doyle, outlining the parties\u2019 conversation regarding payment of the record. On June 20, 2003, the court reporter again forwarded a letter to Mr. Doyle, notifying him that the time for filing the record had passed. The court reporter also noted the possibility of appellant being declared indigent.\nMr. Doyle sent a letter dated February 9, 2004, to appellant, requesting that she sign an affidavit to receive the record as a pauper. Appellant signed and returned the affidavit to Mr. Doyle on February 18,2004.\nId. The trial court further ruled that there was no motion or order in the file that indicates that Mr. Doyle requested or was relieved as attorney of record for appellant.\nMr. Doyle was ordered to appear at 9:00 a.m., on Thursday, January 13, 2005; however, at that time, service had not yet been perfected. We order Mr. Doyle to appear before this court at 9:00 a.m., on Thursday, January 27, 2005, to show cause as to why he should not be held in contempt for his conduct in representing appellant in failing to secure the record for appellant\u2019s appeal. Mr. Doyle\u2019s failure to appear will result in a bench warrant for his arrest.\nIt is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jimmy Doyle, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Keela McGAHEY v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 04-1041\n201 S.W.3d 416\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered January 20, 2005\nJimmy Doyle, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0380-01",
  "first_page_order": 402,
  "last_page_order": 403
}