{
  "id": 5682802,
  "name": "James Richard DORTCH v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dortch v. State",
  "decision_date": "2005-03-31",
  "docket_number": "CR 05-269",
  "first_page": "285",
  "last_page": "285",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 Ark. 285"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "206 S.W.3d 249"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 84,
    "char_count": 720,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.712,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3342168581885638e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6179586602505275
    },
    "sha256": "406173ab4b0f2e93ed93c0ec1449c1a8e2575987728b92e29d89bf5684590a7d",
    "simhash": "1:312a48b57d33dc2d",
    "word_count": 124
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:38:22.368604+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James Richard DORTCH v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant James Richard Dortch, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Thurman Ragar Jr., states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.\nWe find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nThe motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thurman Ragar, Jr., for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James Richard DORTCH v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 05-269\n206 S.W.3d 249\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 31, 2005\nThurman Ragar, Jr., for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0285-01",
  "first_page_order": 305,
  "last_page_order": 305
}