{
  "id": 5683520,
  "name": "James Lee JACKSON v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jackson v. State",
  "decision_date": "2005-03-31",
  "docket_number": "CR 04-854",
  "first_page": "287",
  "last_page": "288",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 Ark. 287"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "206 S.W.3d 246"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "361 Ark. 144",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        5682869
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2005,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/361/0144-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 98,
    "char_count": 872,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.741,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6025395689092299
    },
    "sha256": "d91bc96eff6dab9ca1348148f3b06254233ee13aeafb6293cad3d6be13120bf6",
    "simhash": "1:7c9ad5bbf614be0e",
    "word_count": 153
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:38:22.368604+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James Lee JACKSON v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe procedural background of this matter is set in Jackson v. State, 361 Ark. 144, 205 S.W.3d 137 (2005). Mr. William M. Howard, Jr. appeared before this court on March 24, 2005, to show cause why he should not be held in civil contempt for failing to comply with the terms of our previous per curiam orders. Mr. Howard pled not guilty to contempt and denied that he should be held in contempt for noncompliance with our orders.\nWe hereby appoint a special master, the Honorable Jack Lessenberry, to conduct a hearing on this matter. Upon receipt of the master\u2019s findings, we will render a decision on the matter.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William M. Howard, Jr., for appellant.",
      "Mike Beebe, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Misty Wilson Borkowski, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James Lee JACKSON v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 04-854\n206 S.W.3d 246\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 31, 2005\nWilliam M. Howard, Jr., for appellant.\nMike Beebe, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Misty Wilson Borkowski, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0287-01",
  "first_page_order": 307,
  "last_page_order": 308
}