{
  "id": 5683397,
  "name": "Hezekiah PIERCE v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pierce v. State",
  "decision_date": "2005-03-31",
  "docket_number": "CR 05-230",
  "first_page": "290",
  "last_page": "290",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 Ark. 290"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "206 S.W.3d 247"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "265 Ark. 964",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "year": 1979,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "613 S.W.2d 90",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1174872,
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0203-01",
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "272 Ark. 243",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1174882
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/272/0243-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 92,
    "char_count": 820,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.727,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.16511097751258857
    },
    "sha256": "1e75210478c2ff4dee2d60558316419e710baca165a7ba48343a509f83676541",
    "simhash": "1:326a4a756c2512ed",
    "word_count": 145
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:38:22.368604+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Hezekiah PIERCE v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nHezekiah Pierce, by his attorney, Jonathan T. Lane has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the notice of appeal was not filed in a timely manner due to a mistake on his part.\nWe find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion, which we will treat as a motion for belated appeal. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).\nThe motion for belated appeal is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jonathan T. Lane, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Hezekiah PIERCE v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 05-230\n206 S.W.3d 247\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 31, 2005\nJonathan T. Lane, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0290-01",
  "first_page_order": 310,
  "last_page_order": 310
}