{
  "id": 5682949,
  "name": "James Lee JACKSON v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jackson v. State",
  "decision_date": "2005-04-14",
  "docket_number": "CR 04-854",
  "first_page": "445",
  "last_page": "446",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "361 Ark. 445"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "206 S.W.3d 889"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "327 Ark. 88",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        922631
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1997,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/327/0088-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "206 S.W.3d 246",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.3d",
      "case_ids": [
        5683520,
        5683277
      ],
      "year": 2005,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/361/0287-01",
        "/ark/361/0288-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "361 Ark. 287",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        5683520
      ],
      "year": 2005,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/361/0287-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1584,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.743,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.89950402824256e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3080220120941414
    },
    "sha256": "bcea650727a66dccd39037be2afb08261755dbbc83999667f87d8f3b6a134fa5",
    "simhash": "1:bf0b4d14c88f77ca",
    "word_count": 265
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:38:22.368604+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James Lee JACKSON v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe State has filed this motion to direct appellant\u2019s attorney, William M. Howard, Jr., to comply with Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(h), claiming that the State cannot certify that appellant\u2019s abstract complies with the rule. While appellant\u2019s fifteen-page abstract is complete in some respects, it is not adequate to represent the five-volume, almost 400-page record to permit this court to review his life sentence under Rule 4-3 (h).\nGiven the fact that appellant did not respond to this motion, and given the extensive delays that have already occurred in this case due to numerous extensions and problems occasioned by appellant\u2019s attorney, see, e.g., Jackson v. State, 361 Ark. 287, 206 S.W.3d 246 (2005); McGehee v. State, 327 Ark. 88, 937 S.W.2d 632 (1997), we deny the State\u2019s motion and direct the State to file a supplemental abstract in compliance with Rule 4-3 (h). Our directive is consistent with the State\u2019s burden under Rule 4-3 (h) to \u201cmake certain and certify that all of those objections have been abstracted[.]\u201d\nBecause Mr. William M. Howard, attorney for Mr. Jackson, has again failed to file an adequate abstract and brief, a copy of this per curiam will be sent to the Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct and to the Special Master, Judge Jack Lessenberry, who has previously been appointed to conduct a hearing in this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "No response.",
      "Mike Beebe, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Misty Wilson Borkowski, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James Lee JACKSON v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 04-854\n206 S.W.3d 889\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered April 14, 2005\nNo response.\nMike Beebe, Att\u2019y Gen., by: Misty Wilson Borkowski, Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0445-01",
  "first_page_order": 465,
  "last_page_order": 466
}