{
  "id": 3035012,
  "name": "Brady CARTER v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Carter v. State",
  "decision_date": "2005-11-18",
  "docket_number": "CR 04-164",
  "first_page": "270",
  "last_page": "271",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "364 Ark. 270"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "217 S.W.3d 849"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "543 U.S. 462",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        5967659
      ],
      "weight": 4,
      "year": 2005,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/543/0462-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "329 Ark. 179",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        236204
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1997,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/329/0179-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "360 Ark 266",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        5461169
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2005,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/360/0266-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 199,
    "char_count": 2094,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.767,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08722091519621414
    },
    "sha256": "12ce55263182a7b21353908b39965b8c28ff2ddfabe54e2a5ee3dbcd5cecfe34",
    "simhash": "1:5d8b6858e469b04f",
    "word_count": 350
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:20:15.872106+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Brady CARTER v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nOn January 1,2005, this court affirmed Brady Carter\u2019s convictions for kidnapping and third-degree battery; in the same decision, this court reversed on the State\u2019s cross-appeal, holding that the trial court erroneously reduced Carter\u2019s aggravated robbery charge to the lesser included crime of robbery. In doing so, this court remanded the robbery charge for further proceedings. See Carter v. State, 360 Ark 266, 200 S.W.3d 906 (2005). The decision to remand the robbery charge was based, in part, on State v. Zawodniak, 329 Ark. 179, 946 S.W.2d. 936 (1997), in which this court held that, when a trial judge makes an error of law rather than an error of fact, double jeopardy is not implicated.\nCarter filed a petition for writ of certiorari and a motion for leave to proceed informa pauperis to the United States Supreme Court, both of which were granted. The Supreme Court vacated this court\u2019s original judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Smith v. Massachusetts, 543 U.S. 462, 125 S.Ct. 1129, 160 L.Ed.2d 914 (2005). We now direct the parties to rebrief the sole issue of whether the court\u2019s decision to remand Carter\u2019s robbery charge was in violation of his constitutional rights against double jeopardy. Specifially, in accordance with the Supreme Court\u2019s opinion, we ask the parties to address the impact of Smith v. Massachusetts, supra.\nIt is only fair that the parties should be given an opportunity to present their opinions in this matter by allowing the lawyers to be zealous advocates on behalf of their clients and not mere bystanders. For this reason, rebriefing is ordered. In order to expedite this matter, the State will be required to submit its brief on or before December 18, 2005. Carter\u2019s brief will be due no later than twenty days after the State\u2019s brief is filed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Jeff Rosenzweig and William O. James Jr., for appellant.",
      "Mike Beebe, Att\u2019y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Brady CARTER v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 04-164\n217 S.W.3d 849\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered November 18, 2005\nJeff Rosenzweig and William O. James Jr., for appellant.\nMike Beebe, Att\u2019y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0270-01",
  "first_page_order": 296,
  "last_page_order": 297
}