{
  "id": 3656326,
  "name": "Gyrone BUCKLEY v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Buckley v. State",
  "decision_date": "2006-05-25",
  "docket_number": "CR 06-172",
  "first_page": "452",
  "last_page": "453",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "366 Ark. 452"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "236 S.W.3d 518"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1248,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.802,
    "sha256": "fa47c904ac45d086185a2683fa75b3867927813ae190bb373ac5249cd8c9ab6a",
    "simhash": "1:66198034e3624900",
    "word_count": 208
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:04:10.654271+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Gyrone BUCKLEY v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Gyrone Buckley, by and through his attorney Patrick J. Benca, has filed a motion to stay briefing schedule and a motion for extension of brief time if stay is denied. In his motion to stay briefing schedule, Appellant argues that because there is a pending clemency application before the Governor, he should be granted the stay. This argument is without merit, as there is no certainty of the impact or the outcome of the Governor\u2019s decision. Furthermore, Appellant previously had been granted two brief extensions, with the final extension set to expire on May 11, 2006. We will not grant a motion to stay briefing schedule, based upon the possibility of the Governor\u2019s clemency decision, when Appellant has already been granted a final extension.\nAppellant also seeks a seven-day extension to file his brief. The motion for additional time to file is granted and the time is extended seven days from the date of this order. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.\nMotion to stay briefing schedule denied; motion for extension of brief time granted.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Gyrone BUCKLEY v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 06-172\n236 S.W.3d 518\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered May 25, 2006\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0452-01",
  "first_page_order": 476,
  "last_page_order": 477
}