{
  "id": 3695897,
  "name": "Fernando NAVARRO v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Navarro v. State",
  "decision_date": "2006-09-07",
  "docket_number": "CR 06-549",
  "first_page": "190",
  "last_page": "190",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 Ark. 190"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "238 S.W.3d 610"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 19-4-1604",
      "category": "laws:leg_statute",
      "reporter": "Ark. Code Ann.",
      "year": 2005,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "(b)(2)(B)"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "340 Ark. 84",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1365261
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2000,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/340/0084-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1399,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.746,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.505882454708161e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5215862005854396
    },
    "sha256": "f482beffd98a5422741fed869d0c6ec1e5f91e6a0372050ccb20a6b3ec7d9b90",
    "simhash": "1:19b66a1d68f26984",
    "word_count": 223
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:19:21.310389+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Fernando NAVARRO v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nCristi Beaumont, a full-time state-salaried public defender for the Fourth Judicial District, was appointed by the trial court to represent Appellant Fernando Navarro. Beaumont petitioned this court to be relieved as counsel on appeal based on this court\u2019s holding in Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000), which states that full-time, state-salaried public defenders are ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal. Since Rushing, the General Assembly passed Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp. 2005), which states:\nA person employed as [a] full-time public defender who is not provided a state-funded secretary may also seek compensation for appellate work from the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals.\nBeaumont did not state in her motion whether she employed a full-time, state-funded secretary and her motion was denied without prejudice. Beaumont now moves again to be relieved as counsel on appeal and states in her motion that she is provided with a full-time, state-funded secretary. Therefore, Beaumont\u2019s motion to be relieved as counsel is granted. Susan Lusby will be appointed as counsel for the Appellant, and the Clerk of the court will set a new briefing schedule.\nIt is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Cristi Beaumont, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Fernando NAVARRO v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 06-549\n238 S.W.3d 610\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 7, 2006\nCristi Beaumont, for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0190-01",
  "first_page_order": 214,
  "last_page_order": 214
}