{
  "id": 3695988,
  "name": "Thomas Lee STONE v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Stone v. State",
  "decision_date": "2006-11-02",
  "docket_number": "CR 06-1129",
  "first_page": "614",
  "last_page": "615",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "367 Ark. 614"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "242 S.W.3d 223"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 19-4-1604",
      "category": "laws:leg_statute",
      "reporter": "Ark. Code Ann.",
      "year": 2005,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "(b)(2)(B)"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 16-87-201",
      "category": "laws:leg_statute",
      "reporter": "Ark. Code Ann.",
      "year": 1998,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "et seq."
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "340 Ark. 84",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1365261
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2000,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "holding that full-time, state-salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "holding that full-time, state-salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/340/0084-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 171,
    "char_count": 1754,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.775,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.10739448516110399
    },
    "sha256": "b7b4f0999078aab074d26556e301f20ea4d2ab8da9efca5e404eebe83ab361de",
    "simhash": "1:6a92593c24cea6a9",
    "word_count": 289
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:19:21.310389+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Thomas Lee STONE v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThurman Ragar, Jr., a full-time, state-salaried public defender in Sebastian County, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant, Thomas Lee Stone, an indigent defendant. Following a trial held on June 26, 27, and 29, 2006, appellant was found guilty of nine counts of rape and sentenced to serve four life sentences together with five twenty-year sentences, with the sentences to run consecutively. A timely notice of appeal was filed with the circuit clerk, pursuant to Ark. R. App. P. - Crim. 2, and the record has been lodged in this court.\nMr. Ragar now seeks to be relieved as counsel for appellant in this criminal appeal, based upon the case of Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000) (holding that full-time, state-salaried public defenders were ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal) and Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 16-87-201 et seq. (1998).\nSince the court\u2019s decision in Rushing, the law was changed by the General Assembly. Act 1370 of 2001 provides in part: \u201cA person employed as full-time public defender, who is not provided a state-funded secretary may also seek compensation for appellate work from the Arkansas Supreme Court or the Arkansas Court of Appeals.\u201d That provision is now codified as Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp. 2005).\nMr. Ragar\u2019s motion states that he is provided with a full-time, state-funded secretary. Accordingly, we grant his motion to withdraw as attorney on direct appeal. Greg Knutson will be substituted as attorney of record in this matter. The clerk will establish a briefing schedule.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thurman Ragar, Jr., for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Thomas Lee STONE v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 06-1129\n242 S.W.3d 223\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered November 2, 2006\nThurman Ragar, Jr., for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0614-01",
  "first_page_order": 638,
  "last_page_order": 639
}