{
  "id": 4016886,
  "name": "Loretta L. SANDERS v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sanders v. State",
  "decision_date": "2007-04-12",
  "docket_number": "CR 07-314",
  "first_page": "423",
  "last_page": "424",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "369 Ark. 423"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "255 S.W.3d 444"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "366 Ark. 348",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        3655385
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2006,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/366/0348-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "238 S.W.3d 610",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.3d",
      "case_ids": [
        3695897,
        3696167
      ],
      "year": 2006,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/367/0190-01",
        "/ark/367/0183-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "367 Ark. 190",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        3695897
      ],
      "year": 2006,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/367/0190-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "340 Ark. 84",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1365261
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2000,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/340/0084-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 190,
    "char_count": 2212,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.783,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.1258712380528749
    },
    "sha256": "83e6fc02019b9113954502cb258f0a2acbcdb2a6bc6691f74dfe9c8d9860b0e3",
    "simhash": "1:75ca4435eaf3d8e5",
    "word_count": 368
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:01:48.941240+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Loretta L. SANDERS v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nIn 2004, Loretta L. Sanders entered a plea of guilty to possession of a controlled substance and breaking or entering. Imposition of a sixty-month term of imprisonment for each offense was suspended. A fine of $500 was imposed and petitioner was ordered to make restitution. In 2006, probation was revoked, and petitioner was sentenced to an aggregate term of 108 months\u2019 imprisonment. She appeals the revocation of her probation.\nThe trial court appointed Cash Haaser, who is a full-time, state-salaried public defender with a full-time, state funded secretary, to represent petitioner. Haaser filed a timely notice of appeal and tendered the record on appeal. The supreme court clerk refused to file the record because the circuit court\u2019s order extending time to file the record did not comply with Rule 5(b)(1)(C) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Mr. Haaser now seeks to lodge the record and to be relieved as counsel.\nIn Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000), we held that full-time, state-salaried public defenders are ineligible for compensation for their work on appeal. Since Rushing, the General Assembly passed Ark.Code Ann. \u00a7 19-4-1604(b)(2)(B) (Supp.2005), which states:\nA person employed as [a] full-time public defender who is not provided a state-funded secretary may also seek compensation for appellate work from the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals.\nBecause Haaser is not eligible for compensation on appeal, his motion to be relieved as counsel is granted. Navarro v. State, 367 Ark. 190, 238 S.W.3d 610 (2006); Mejia v. State, 366 Ark. 348, 235 S.W.3d 519 (2006). We also grant petitioner\u2019s motion for rule on clerk and direct that the record be lodged because the State\u2019s attorney stated in open court on December 20, 2006, that the State had no objection to the motion for extension of time. Attorney Scott A. Strain is appointed to represent petitioner on appeal. As the record on appeal has been lodged, our clerk will set a new briefing schedule for the appeal.\nMotions granted.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Cash Haaser, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Loretta L. SANDERS v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 07-314\n255 S.W.3d 444\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered April 12, 2007\nCash Haaser, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0423-01",
  "first_page_order": 453,
  "last_page_order": 454
}