{ "id": 1870910, "name": "Mann v. The State", "name_abbreviation": "Mann v. State", "decision_date": "1881-11", "docket_number": "", "first_page": "405", "last_page": "408", "citations": [ { "type": "official", "cite": "37 Ark. 405" } ], "court": { "name_abbreviation": "Ark.", "id": 8808, "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court" }, "jurisdiction": { "id": 34, "name_long": "Arkansas", "name": "Ark." }, "cites_to": [], "analysis": { "cardinality": 295, "char_count": 4744, "ocr_confidence": 0.387, "pagerank": { "raw": 2.689007329423575e-07, "percentile": 0.8273486214833374 }, "sha256": "3f1d7bf3128c17688177ca6296ab05d43a6ae872396493e1d96baddd29a2faaa", "simhash": "1:9c3b753d38a6cc4e", "word_count": 847 }, "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:57:17.182005+00:00", "provenance": { "date_added": "2019-08-29", "source": "Harvard", "batch": "2018" }, "casebody": { "judges": [], "parties": [ "Mann v. The State." ], "opinions": [ { "text": "English, C. J.\nIt appears from the transcript returned\u2019 on the writ of error sued out by George W. Mann to the-Circuit Court of Garland count}' in this case, that on thefirstof February, 1879, Jacob Kempner made' complaiut on-oath-before a Justice of the Peace of said county, charging that-on that day said George W. Mann committed the offense of taking- possession of real estate, by violence, belonging to-said Kempner in said county. That thereupon a warrant of arrest was issued against Mann, and he was brought for trial-before the justice on the fifth of the same month, pleaded not guilty, waived a jury, was tried and found guilty by the justice, and fined $50 and costs.\nThat on the next day he took an appeal to the Circuit Court, by filing in the office of the clerk, a transcript of the warrant of arrest and the judgment of the justice, and executed an appeal bond with G. C. Greenway and P. H. Ells-worth as sureties. The bond was dated on the fifth and filed, in the clerk\u2019s office on the sixth of Februaiy, 1879.\nThat \u00f3n the nineteenth of August, 1879, Mann filed a motion in the Circuit Court to dismiss the case on thegrouiids: 1st. That Kempner was prosecutor, and was not required to give bond for costs before the Justice of the Peace, and gave none. 2nd. That the justice had no jurisdiction of the offense charged.\nIt does not appear that this motion was ever called up, or decided by the court, and no entry appears to have been made in the case until the August term, 1880, when the case was called, and Mann failing to appear and prosecute his appeal, the judgment of the justice was affirmed, and judgement entered against Mann and his sureties in the appeal bond for the $50 fine and for costs.\nMann, only, brought error.\nI. It is made a misdemeanor by Statute ( Gantt\u2019s Digest, Sec. 1518), to take or keep possession of any real estate by actual force or violence, without authority of law, etc., and the offense is within jurisdiction of a Justice of the Peace.\nII. As to the bond for costs, appellant should have prosecuted his appeal, appeared in the Circuit Court, called up his motion to dismiss, and had it ruled upon by the court, which he failed to do.\nIt may be remarked, however, that if the prosecutor failed to give a bond for cost as required by section 2020 of Gantt\u2019s Dig., or was not excused from doing so on affidavit of inability as authorized by section 2023, lb.. Mann should have applied to the Justice of the Peace to rule him to give the bond, or to show cause.\nThe failure to give bond for costs could only be matter in abatement, and was waived by the plea of not guilty. See cases cited in Hose\u2019s Digest, Title Hond for costs.\nIII. The Circuit Court erredin rendering judgment against the sureties in the appeal bond without scire facias, as required by the Statute in force when the bond was executed. Gantt\u2019s Digest, Secs. 2112-15. The judgment was, perhaps, rendered under the Act of March 15th, 1879 (Acts of 1879, p. 84), which was passed after the execution of the bond. But the sureties did not join in the writ of error.\nAs to plaintiff in error the judgment must be affirmed.", "type": "majority", "author": "English, C. J." } ], "attorneys": [ "G. B. Moore, Attorney-General, for the appellee." ], "corrections": "", "head_matter": "Mann v. The State.\nCriminal Law : Taking or holding real estate by force: Jurisdiction.\nBy Statute (Gantt's Digest, Sec. 1518), it isa misdemeanor to take or hold possession of real estate by force or violence without authority of law; and a Justice of the Peace has jurisdiction of the offense.\n2. Criminal Practice : Bonds for cost in misdemeanors before J. P.\nA failure of the prosecutor to give bond for cost in a misdemeanor case before a Justice of the Peace, is matter in abatement, and is waived by the defendant pleading not guilty, instead oi requiring him by rule to give the bond.\n\u25a0U. Same: Judgments against sureties on appeal bond: Sci?'e facias.\nPrevious to the Act of March 15th, 1879 (Acts of 1879, p. 84), it was error to render judgment against sureties in appeal bonds from in misdemeanor cases from Justice of the Peace.\n4. Practice in Supreme Cour r: As to error against party not appealing.\nJudgments, though erroneous, as to parties who do not appeal, will not be reversed upon the appeal of a party as to whom there is no error.\nERROR to Garland Circuit Court,\nHon, J. N. Cypert (on exchange), Circuit Judge.\nG. B. Moore, Attorney-General, for the appellee.\nThe prosecutor\u2019s bond for costs is discretionary. If magistrate sees lit to try the cause without requiring it to be given, and accused does not object, he cannot raise the objection here.\nSee. 1518, Gantt\u2019s Digest, is plain and unambiguous. It was a misdemeanor, and Justices of the Peace have concurrent jurisdiction in all misdemeanors.\nThere is no exception noted \u2014 no motion for a new trial\u2014 no bill of exceptions." }, "file_name": "0405-01", "first_page_order": 403, "last_page_order": 406 }