{
  "id": 5568195,
  "name": "John NASH v. ARKANSAS ELEVATOR SAFETY BOARD and Arkansas Department of Labor",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nash v. Arkansas Elevator Safety Board",
  "decision_date": "2007-05-17",
  "docket_number": "06-1257",
  "first_page": "86",
  "last_page": "87",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "370 Ark. 86"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "257 S.W.3d 80"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "361 Ark. 150",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        5683907
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "year": 2005,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/361/0150-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 173,
    "char_count": 1882,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.761,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.8591662004228935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3662767597647585
    },
    "sha256": "c4f501ad280423e30b4d38df4636b28f688f75adaab943403c57cfcb10e3d235",
    "simhash": "1:7f0bacac4604ff8e",
    "word_count": 327
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:32:56.927728+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John NASH v. ARKANSAS ELEVATOR SAFETY BOARD and Arkansas Department of Labor"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis appeal arises from an order from the Pulaski County Circuit Court affirming the February 22, 2005 and June 24, 2005 orders of Appellee Arkansas Elevator Safety Board (Board). Both orders were issued by the Board in response to a request filed by Appellant John Nash with respect to a freight elevator located in a Little Rock warehouse. We order Nash to rebrief.\nWe do not reach the merits of Nash\u2019s appeal because of his failure to comply with Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-1 (2006). We may raise issues of deficiencies sua sponte. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3) (2006); Unum Life Ins. Co. of America v. Edwards, 361 Ark. 150, 205 S.W.3d 126 (2005). Under Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-1 (a), \u201c[b]riefs shall be double-spaced, except for quoted material, which may be single-spaced and indented.\u201d Upon our review of Nash\u2019s brief, the line spacing appears to be between single-spaced and double-spaced. In other words, his brief has thirty lines per page while Appellees\u2019 brief has twenty-two lines per page. Thus, the effect of Nash\u2019s spacing gives him more than the requisite twenty-five pages of text without having first sought our permission to file an overlarge brief. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-1(b).\nFor these reasons, we order rebriefmg. Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-1 (d) (2006) provides that \u201c[b]riefs not in compliance with this Rule shall not be accepted by the Clerk.\u201d Nash has seven days from the date of this opinion to file a substituted brief to conform to Rule 4-1. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4~2(c) (2006). If Nash resubmits a compliant brief within seven days, then our Clerk shall accept the brief. Id.\nRebriefmg ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Nash Law Firm, by; John Nash, for appellant.",
      "Denise P. Oxley, for appellee Arkansas Dep\u2019t of Labor."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John NASH v. ARKANSAS ELEVATOR SAFETY BOARD and Arkansas Department of Labor\n06-1257\n257 S.W.3d 80\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered May 17, 2007\nNash Law Firm, by; John Nash, for appellant.\nDenise P. Oxley, for appellee Arkansas Dep\u2019t of Labor."
  },
  "file_name": "0086-01",
  "first_page_order": 110,
  "last_page_order": 111
}