{
  "id": 5567941,
  "name": "Karen Ann EISEN v. John A. SMITH & Wanda Smith",
  "name_abbreviation": "Eisen v. Smith",
  "decision_date": "2007-09-06",
  "docket_number": "07-873",
  "first_page": "463",
  "last_page": "463",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "370 Ark. 463"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "261 S.W.3d 468"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "97 Ark. App. 130",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        6138341
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2006,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark-app/97/0130-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1587,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.821,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.16195249221093586
    },
    "sha256": "378cc519b0f3f83e41b7c6274854e6e124e358bf7c5b9fd376d7a5020707c0d3",
    "simhash": "1:756adb766f62e4a6",
    "word_count": 282
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:32:56.927728+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Karen Ann EISEN v. John A. SMITH & Wanda Smith"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Karen A. Eisen moves this court for a rule on clerk, claiming that she tendered the record in a timely fashion. The record reflects that in Smith v. Eisen, 97 Ark. App. 130, 245 S.W.3d 160 (2006), the court of appeals reversed and remanded on cross-appeal, directing the circuit court to take evidence on the issue of attorney\u2019s fees and to enter an appropriate award to Eisen. The circuit court did so and entered its order, awarding Eisen $17,666.25 in fees, on March 7, 2007.\nOn March 21, 2007, Eisen filed a timely posttrial motion for partial relief from the judgment on attorney\u2019s fees and other items and a brief in support. The Smiths responded, and while the circuit court sent correspondence to the parties on the matter, no order was filed. The motion was thus deemed denied on April 20, 2007. See Ark. R. App. P.-Civ. 4(b)(1) (2007). On May 16, 2007, Eisen timely filed her notice of appeal from both the March 7, 2007 order and the deemed denial of her posttrial motion. She then tendered the record to this court\u2019s clerk on August 10, 2007, which was well within the ninety-day period for filing the record. See Ark. R. App. P.-Civ. 5(a) (2007).\nBecause our review of the record reveals that Eisen\u2019s record was timely tendered to this court, we grant her motion for rule on clerk and direct the clerk to file the record.\nMotion for rule on clerk granted.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robert R. Cloar, for appellant.",
      "J. Timothy Smith, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Karen Ann EISEN v. John A. SMITH & Wanda Smith\n07-873\n261 S.W.3d 468\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 6, 2007\nRobert R. Cloar, for appellant.\nJ. Timothy Smith, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0463-01",
  "first_page_order": 487,
  "last_page_order": 487
}