{
  "id": 5568700,
  "name": "NABHOLZ CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. CONTRACTORS FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION ASSOCIATION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Nabholz Construction Corp. v. Contractors for Public Protection Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "2007-09-13",
  "docket_number": "07-843",
  "first_page": "527",
  "last_page": "527",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "370 Ark. 527"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "262 S.W.3d 138"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1573,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.805,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3342168581885638e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6178594982811586
    },
    "sha256": "14435be1bc15840c672f8a98c7d95c78580081299c48715c945aa139f1c001e1",
    "simhash": "1:7fdafbfaddeb527b",
    "word_count": 248
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:32:56.927728+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "NABHOLZ CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. CONTRACTORS FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION ASSOCIATION"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nOn August 28, 2007, appellee, Contractors for Public Protection Association, filed a motion to expedite the appeal in this case. The case arises from an order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court in an action under the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act, Arkansas Code Annotated \u00a7 25-19-101 to -109 (Repl. 2002 & Supp. 2007). Appellant was ordered to produce certain documents under the Act relating to a construction project for the State of Arkansas. On April 30, 2007, the circuit court stayed its order pending this appeal. Appellee now requests that the appeal of this case and the corresponding briefing schedule be expedited.\nAppellant contends that appellee has failed to show good cause to expedite the appeal. However, if the court grants the motion to expedite, appellant requests that appellee be ordered to post a bond with good and sufficient surety in an amount to be determined by this court to compensate appellant for additional attorney\u2019s fees and costs associated with an expedited appeal.\nWe grant appellees motion to expedite and order that the parties file simultaneous briefs by September 24, 2007. Simultaneous reply briefs shall be submitted on or before October 1, 2007. No bond shall be required in connection with the expedited appeal.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Friday, Eldredge & Clark, LLP, by: Jeffrey H. Moore, for appellant.",
      "Howell Trice Hope & Files, by: Ronald A. Hope, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "NABHOLZ CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. CONTRACTORS FOR PUBLIC PROTECTION ASSOCIATION\n07-843\n262 S.W.3d 138\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 13, 2007\nFriday, Eldredge & Clark, LLP, by: Jeffrey H. Moore, for appellant.\nHowell Trice Hope & Files, by: Ronald A. Hope, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0527-01",
  "first_page_order": 551,
  "last_page_order": 551
}