{
  "id": 3666591,
  "name": "STATE of Arkansas v. Renee WHITFIELD",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Whitfield",
  "decision_date": "2008-03-13",
  "docket_number": "CR 07-640",
  "first_page": "36",
  "last_page": "36",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "373 Ark. 36"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "280 S.W.3d 29"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "280 S.W.3d 20",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.3d",
      "case_ids": [
        3665745,
        3665991
      ],
      "year": 2008,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/373/0001-01",
        "/ark/373/0037-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "373 Ark. 1",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        3665745
      ],
      "year": 2008,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/373/0001-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 93,
    "char_count": 769,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.778,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.6978394779337346e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7003062726823069
    },
    "sha256": "3ebcd8c513d6afd3121002a522b26175b40f1e07cf6081adecb3c204212cfa21",
    "simhash": "1:2f4ad78047915aa8",
    "word_count": 132
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:24:36.449526+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE of Arkansas v. Renee WHITFIELD"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PAUL DANIELSON, Justice.\nAppellant the State of Arkansas appeals from the circuit court\u2019s dismissal of charges against appellee Renee Whitfield due to an allegedly defective arrest warrant. The sole point on appeal is that the circuit court erred as a matter of law in doing so. As the facts pertinent to this appeal are sufficiently set forth in State v. Richardson, 373 Ark. 1, 280 S.W.3d 20 (2008), handed down this same date, it is unnecessary to do so here. For the reasons set forth in Richardson, we reverse and remand.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PAUL DANIELSON, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Dustin McDaniel, Att\u2019y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE of Arkansas v. Renee WHITFIELD\nCR 07-640\n280 S.W.3d 29\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered March 13, 2008\nDustin McDaniel, Att\u2019y Gen., by: David R. Raupp, Sr. Ass\u2019t Att\u2019y Gen., for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0036-01",
  "first_page_order": 62,
  "last_page_order": 62
}