{
  "id": 3664984,
  "name": "IN RE ADOPTION of M.K.C. v. POPE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT",
  "name_abbreviation": "Adoption of M.K.C. v. Pope County Circuit Court",
  "decision_date": "2008-06-05",
  "docket_number": "08-258",
  "first_page": "603",
  "last_page": "605",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "373 Ark. 603"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "285 S.W.3d 605"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "341 Ark. 949",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1257762
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2000,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "951"
        },
        {
          "page": "386"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/341/0949-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "373 Ark. 600",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        3666546
      ],
      "weight": 4,
      "year": 2008,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/373/0600-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 9-9-204",
      "category": "laws:leg_statute",
      "reporter": "Ark. Code Ann.",
      "weight": 4,
      "year": 2002,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "(3)"
        },
        {
          "page": "(3)"
        },
        {
          "page": "(3)"
        },
        {
          "page": "(3)"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 201,
    "char_count": 2870,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.784,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.47897663348677e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3434644259182678
    },
    "sha256": "66cb1aa3c15691f094e1172e6eb13a57c9b2133c108d77ddd9fdaf7ffa27195a",
    "simhash": "1:4d2e82c754bdf717",
    "word_count": 487
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:24:36.449526+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IN RE ADOPTION of M.K.C. v. POPE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Jim Gunter, Justice.\nThis appeal arises from an order of the Pope County Circuit Court ruling that Appellant, Callie Michelle Cox, is not eligible to adopt her biological minor child, M.K.C. Specifically, the circuit court found that Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 9-9-204(3) (Repl. 2002) does not permit an unmarried mother to adopt her child, and, therefore, the court denied her petition. For the reasons set forth in King v. Ochoa, 373 Ark. 600, 285 S.W.3d 602 (2008), we reverse and remand for consideration of the adoption petition on the merits.\nOn October 15, 2007, Appellant filed a petition for the adoption of M.K.C. The petition stated that Appellant is the biological mother of the child. It further alleged that no father had been involved in the life of the child, and after an inquiry was sent to the Arkansas Department of Flealth and Human Services, no matching claim was found in the Arkansas Putative Father Registry. At a hearing on October 25, 2007, the court denied Appellant\u2019s petition for adoption. The court noted that, while Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 9-9-204(3) does not prohibit adoption of a child by the biological mother, Appellant\u2019s petition should be denied for public policy reasons. An order of dismissal was entered on November 19, 2007, which stated that Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 9-9-204(3) does not permit an unmarried natural mother to adopt her own child. Appellant timely filed her notice of appeal on December 3, 2007.\nIn Appellant\u2019s sole point on appeal, she argues that the circuit court erred in its interpretation of Ark. Code Ann. \u00a7 9-9-204(3). Appellant contends that \u00a7 9-9-204(3) permits an unmarried mother to adopt her child for the purpose of establishing herself as the only person with a parent-child relationship to the individual to be adopted, and that the circuit court incorrectly denied her adoption petition.\nThis court has consistently held that adoption statutes are to be strictly construed and applied. In re Adoption of Tompkins, 341 Ark. 949, 951, 20 S.W.3d 385, 386 (2000). For the reasons set forth in King v. Ochoa, 373 Ark. 600, 285 S.W.3d 602 (2008), we hold that the circuit erred in its interpretation of \u00a7 9-9-204. Under this section, an unmarried mother or father may adopt; however, \u00a7 9-9-204 only sets out who may adopt. All other requirements under the Uniform Adoption Act must still be met. Accordingly, we reverse the ruling of the circuit court and remand for consideration of the adoption petition on the merits.\nReversed and remanded.\nIt should be noted that this inquiry was searched under the name \u201cInfant Bracks\u201d in contrast to the child\u2019s name identified in this appeal, M.K.C.\nNo appellee\u2019s brief was filed in this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Jim Gunter, Justice."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Sanford Law Firm, PLLC, by: Josh Sarford, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IN RE ADOPTION of M.K.C. v. POPE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT\n08-258\n285 S.W.3d 605\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered June 5, 2008\nSanford Law Firm, PLLC, by: Josh Sarford, for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0603-01",
  "first_page_order": 631,
  "last_page_order": 633
}