{
  "id": 3690381,
  "name": "Edward S. McWILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "McWilliams v. State",
  "decision_date": "2008-09-04",
  "docket_number": "CR 08-738",
  "first_page": "155",
  "last_page": "156",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "374 Ark. 155"
    },
    {
      "type": "parallel",
      "cite": "286 S.W.3d 683"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "875 S.W.2d 836",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.W.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        1443744,
        1443853
      ],
      "year": 1994,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/317/0042-01",
        "/ark/317/0045-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "317 Ark. 42",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1443744
      ],
      "year": 1994,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/317/0042-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "373 Ark. 190",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        3665451
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 2008,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        },
        {
          "parenthetical": "per curiam"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/373/0190-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "356 Ark. 106",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        5369074
      ],
      "weight": 4,
      "year": 2004,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/356/0106-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 174,
    "char_count": 2392,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.793,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.10713076322210291
    },
    "sha256": "e0266656bac252c7765384eacd066d7b24325583778eff87e7db7012d6172f99",
    "simhash": "1:384a14f583174cad",
    "word_count": 403
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:36:09.980592+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edward S. McWILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppellant Edward S. McWilliams, by and through his attorney, Robert N. Jeffrey, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. Appellant pled guilty to possession of a firearm by certain persons on November 23, 2004, was sentenced to probation for five years, and ordered to pay a fine, court costs, and attorneys\u2019 fees. By judgment and commitment order entered March 4, 2008, Appellant\u2019s probation was revoked, and he was sentenced to eighty-four months in the Arkansas Department of Correction. On March 14, 2008, an amended judgment and commitment order was entered to correct a clerical error that the commitment was a result of the revocation of his probation. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 7, 2008, from the judgment and commitment order entered March 4, 2008. The record was completed and filed with the trial court on June 19, 2008, and tendered to the clerk of this court on June 23, 2008. The supreme court clerk refused to file the record because the notice of appeal was filed more than thirty days after the first judgment and commitment order was entered.\nAppellant\u2019s counsel filed this motion for rule on clerk, candidly admitting therein that he did not file the notice of appeal within thirty days of the entry of the first judgment. Where a motion for rule on clerk is filed in error, it will be treated as a motion for belated appeal. McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). Despite Appellant\u2019s failure to properly perfect this appeal, the State cannot penalize a criminal defendant by declining to consider his first appeal when counsel has failed to follow appellate rules. Morris v. State, 373 Ark. 190, 282 S.W.3d 757 (2008) (per curiam) (citing Franklin v. State, 317 Ark. 42, 875 S.W.2d 836 (1994) (per curiam)). Consistent with our explanation of handling motions for rule on clerk and belated appeals in McDonald, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883, we consider this a motion for belated appeal. Because counsel candidly admits fault, we grant the motion for belated appeal and direct the clerk of this court to accept the record and docket the appeal. We forward this opinion to the Committee on Professional Conduct.\nMotion treated as belated appeal; granted.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robert N. Jeffrey, for appellant.",
      "No response."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edward S. McWILLIAMS v. STATE of Arkansas\nCR 08-738\n286 S.W.3d 683\nSupreme Court of Arkansas\nOpinion delivered September 4, 2008\nRobert N. Jeffrey, for appellant.\nNo response."
  },
  "file_name": "0155-01",
  "first_page_order": 179,
  "last_page_order": 180
}