{
  "id": 8729349,
  "name": "Bailey vs. Ralph",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bailey v. Ralph",
  "decision_date": "1842-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "591",
  "last_page": "591",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "4 Ark. 591"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 225,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.515,
    "sha256": "72eaa273cb74efed7044881ca493fe878f61f78e771673b9a378f1c6df6c1de4",
    "simhash": "1:9c79ab30613b41db",
    "word_count": 41
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:55:34.553089+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Bailey vs. Ralph."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Held, that if, in replevin, there is judgment for the defendant, de retorno habendo, and an order for a writ of enquiry to assess damages, there is no final judgment from which an appeal lies to this court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Bailey vs. Ralph."
  },
  "file_name": "0591-02",
  "first_page_order": 591,
  "last_page_order": 591
}