{
  "id": 8729522,
  "name": "Woodruff, Ex Parte",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ex parte Woodruff",
  "decision_date": "1842-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "630",
  "last_page": "630",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "4 Ark. 630"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 41,
    "char_count": 324,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.503,
    "sha256": "9421dfdbef05d5b0c4e4e35dd0276dbd5f24123b1c4c68bdfd54535021922764",
    "simhash": "1:532dc5b4b65449d9",
    "word_count": 55
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:55:34.553089+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Woodruff, Ex Parte."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Held, that although the judges of an inferior court do not obey an order of this court, and thereby subject themselves to an attachment for contempt, yet, if their return to the mandamus shows that there was no intentional contempt on their part \u2014 instead of an attachment, an alias mandamus will issue.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Woodruff, Ex Parte."
  },
  "file_name": "0630-02",
  "first_page_order": 630,
  "last_page_order": 630
}