{
  "id": 1897163,
  "name": "Independence County vs. Dunkin, et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Independence County v. Dunkin",
  "decision_date": "1883-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "329",
  "last_page": "332",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "40 Ark. 329"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "4 Ark., 473",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8729054
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/4/0473-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 265,
    "char_count": 4095,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.449,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.75156342275133e-07,
      "percentile": 0.708592856185824
    },
    "sha256": "6c6841968a3447864829f4e227a01c76a65fbc4c8ccb5ba0dead1d430d4ae05d",
    "simhash": "1:1277e2a8225b9f42",
    "word_count": 719
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:01:35.838243+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Independence County vs. Dunkin, et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Smith, J.\nOne Matlock was indicted in Independence Circuit Coui\u2019t for murder. He obtained a change of venue to Lawrence, and was tried and acquitted. A judgment for the costs of the prosecution was rendered against Independence county. A duly certified bill of costs was presented to the Independence County Court, all of which was allowed except $140.\nOn the trial of Matlock, only four jurors were accepted from the re\u2019gular panel. The other eight were selected from a special venire, and they served five days, and were entitled to $10 each for their- services, making $80. Thirty other persons were also sumxnoned on the special venire, but were not taken on the trial jury. They each claimed pay for one day\u2019s .attendance as jurors, amounting in the aggregate to $60. The presiding Judge certified the per diem of the eight jurors selected from the special venire who did serve, and the per diem of the thirty who were summoned, but did not serve, as part of the costs chargeable to the county of Independence. But the County Court rejected these items and the claimants appealed to the Circuit Court, where they obtained a judgment.\nThe statute makes each county liable for costs incurred in the prosecution of offenses committed within its limits, if the defendant is acquitted, and also in case of conviction, if he has no property. Gantt\u2019s Digest, Sec. 2015.\nAnd that liability continues, though the venue be changed to another county; Pulaski County v. Irvin, 4 Ark., 473; County of Ouachita v. Sanders, 10 Id. 467.\nBut the costs lor which the county where the prosecution began is liable, are the costs which it could have recovei\u2019ed of him, if he had been convicted and of sufficient ability to pay. Now the compensation of jurors, both in civil and criminal cases, seems to be a' part of the current expenses of holding the Circuit Courts, and in the same category with fuel, lights, stationery, etc., which thq statute directs shall be paid out of the county treasury of the county in which the Court is held. Gantt\u2019s Digest, Sec. 1176.\nThis is certainly the case when the jury is selected from the regular panel. Jurors\u2019 fees are not taxed against the losing party in a civil action, nor against a convicted defendant in a criminal case. And we do not remember any statute which provides a different mode of compensation for talesmen. The clerk gives * to each juror a certificate of his attendance, (act of Feb. 25, 1875, Sec. 38), which is afterwards to be presented to the County Court for audit, aud upon its allowance a warrant is issued. This applies as well to jurors called upon to serve from the by-standers as'to the regular venire.\nFor error in holding Independence county liable to pay these fees as a part of the cost the judgment is reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Smith, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "II. S. Coleman, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Independence County vs. Dunkin, et al.\nCost : Against County when -venue changed. Fees of jurors no fart of cost\nThe liability of a county .for.costs incurred in the prosecution of offenses committed within its limits, includes the cost accruing in another county upon a change of venue; but the compensation of jurors is no part of the cost in either civil or criminal cases, but is part of the current expenses of holding the Circuit Courts, iike fuel, lights, stationery, &c., to be paid by the county in which the Court is held. They are not taxable as cost in the case.\nAPPEAL from Independence Circuit Court.\nHon. R. H. Powell, Circuit Judge.\nII. S. Coleman, for appellant.\nJurors fees are not taxable as costs in a criminal case, nor the fees of Talesmen. See Acts 1875, Seo. 38, p. 185; lb. p. 25, See. 58 and p. 125, Sec. 8.\nThe compensation of jurors in the Circuit Court is a pai\u2019t of the \u201cexpenses of Court\u201d to be paid as expenses of fuel, stationery, sheriffs fees, &c. Gantt\u2019s Digest, Sec. 1176..\nIf Matlock had been convicted, no judgment could have been rendered against him for jury fees as part of the costs.\nEach county must pay its own juries, and furnish them with suitable furniture, fuel, lights, food, lodging, &c. Gantt\u2019s Digest, Secs. 1940 and 1941; and they cannot be taxed as part of the costs."
  },
  "file_name": "0329-01",
  "first_page_order": 327,
  "last_page_order": 330
}