{
  "id": 1896217,
  "name": "Patton v. State",
  "name_abbreviation": "Patton v. State",
  "decision_date": "1883-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "486",
  "last_page": "488",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "41 Ark. 486"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "16 Am. Dec., 405",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "Am. Dec.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "5 Pick., 259",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Pick.",
      "case_ids": [
        2033187
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/mass/22/0259-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "27 Ark., 113",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1885747
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/27/0113-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "1 Ark., 345",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 180,
    "char_count": 3058,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.492,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.6343475431493036e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6895958026896549
    },
    "sha256": "5e2f10684a064e30cf2810c851368740e760c9ec2e10922b32108164c613baa8",
    "simhash": "1:0645c4b042ab5652",
    "word_count": 525
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:24:33.230898+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Patton v. State."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "English, C. J.\nThomas J. Patton was indicted for a misdemeanor in the circuit court of Ouachita county. He filed a demurrer to the indictment which the court overruled and adjudged that he pay all costs in and about the d.emurrer expended.\nHe then pleaded not guilty, was tried and acquitted, and the final judgment was that he \u201cbe discharged and that \u25a0Ouachita county pay all costs'herein expended.\u201d\nIn taxing up the costs in the case, the clerk taxed defendant with costs on the demurrer to the indictment, $7,30, including a fee of $5 to the prosecuting attorney. Defendant filed a motion to retax the costs, which was overruled by the court, and he appealed.\nIt is submitted for appellant \u2014 first, that he should have been taxed with no costs; and second, that if taxable with the costs of the demurrer, there is no statute allowing the prosecuting attorney a fee of $5 on a judgment merely \u2022overruling 'a demurrer to an indictment.\nI. Ordinarily, the costs in a criminal case will abide and follow the final judgment. But, if in the course of the prosecution, the court has specially adjudged the cost of some particular matter against defendant, the general judgment for costs against the county on his acquittal will not. relieve him from such specially adjudged costs.\nII. There is no statute allowing a prosecuting attorney a fee of $5 on a judgment overruling a demurrer in a criminal prosecution. In criminal prosecutions he is allowed no fees except on convictions. \u2014 Fees Act. thirteenth Dec.,, 1875, sec. 1.\nHe is allowed a fee of $5 \u201c for each judgment obtained on complaint, information, or otherwise in the name of the State or any county,\u201d \u2014 lb. But this has no application to-a judgment merely overruling a demurrer to an indictment, in a criminal case.\nReversed and remanded to the court below with instructions to sustain the motion to retax the costs, by striking-from the costs taxed against appellant the fee of $5 to the prosecuting attorney.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "English, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "H. G. Bunn for appellant.",
      "O. B. Moore, attorney general contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Patton v. State.\n1. COSTS: In Criminal oases.\nOrdinarily, the cost in a criminal case will abide and follow the final judgment. But if in the course of the prosecution the court has specially adjudged the cost of some particular matter ag\u2019ainst the defendant (e. g., the cost upon overruling his demurrer to the indictment), he must pay it, 'though he he acquitted on the trial and a general judgment of cost he rendered against the county.\n3. t\u00edAME:\u2019 Fee of prosecuting attorney \u25a0\nThe prosecuting attorney is not entitled to a fee on a judgment overruling the defendant\u2019s demurrer to the complaint. He is allowed no fees in criminal prosecutions except on convictions.\nAPPEAL from Ouachita circuit court.\nHon. C. E. Mitchell, Circuit Judge.\nH. G. Bunn for appellant.\nThis is not a case coming under sec. 1, Acts 1875, p. 103.\nThe cost except in equity follow the final judgment. \u2014 1 Ark., 345; 1 Stewart, Ala., 63. Overruling a demurrer not a final order or judgment. \u2014 27 Ark., 113. Costs at law adjudged to winner. \u2014 5 Pick., 259; 16 Am. Dec., 405.\nO. B. Moore, attorney general contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0486-01",
  "first_page_order": 482,
  "last_page_order": 484
}