{
  "id": 8727080,
  "name": "Collier vs. Collier",
  "name_abbreviation": "Collier v. Collier",
  "decision_date": "1843-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "261",
  "last_page": "261",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 Ark. 261"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 45,
    "char_count": 337,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.555,
    "sha256": "938f93a947fc08b230654e03dbbb857d7a59418f8ed485f6afdef5ada79d89eb",
    "simhash": "1:0ae93f263a4f8c28",
    "word_count": 60
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:02:08.123138+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Collier vs. Collier."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Held\nThat where the plaintiff excepted to a decision arresting his judgment, and had taken his exceptions and had them filed, and then \u201cin open court said he would go no further in said suit, and objected to the continuance on the docket\u201d \u2014 this was a voluntary not. pros, or retraxit, and he could not bring error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Held"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Collier vs. Collier."
  },
  "file_name": "0261-01",
  "first_page_order": 261,
  "last_page_order": 261
}