{
  "id": 8727948,
  "name": "Harris vs. Foster",
  "name_abbreviation": "Harris v. Foster",
  "decision_date": "1844-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "717",
  "last_page": "717",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 Ark. 717"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 35,
    "char_count": 277,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.484,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.317852702137001e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4364457155610231
    },
    "sha256": "5d258fe3c51a15ad3add8db927b21469dfb8217737d26bf5b8e9dd84418ae64e",
    "simhash": "1:4acd63bfd49c78c5",
    "word_count": 49
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:02:08.123138+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Harris vs. Foster."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Held,\nthat on appeal (o the circuit court from the probate court, if there be error in the judgment of the probate court, the cause should be tried de novo, and the judgment certified back. Cross et al. vs. Barnes, and Crabtree vs. Crabtree, ante. Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Held,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Harris vs. Foster."
  },
  "file_name": "0717-01",
  "first_page_order": 717,
  "last_page_order": 717
}