{
  "id": 1913395,
  "name": "Hathaway v. Werner",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hathaway v. Werner",
  "decision_date": "1889-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "171",
  "last_page": "171",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "52 Ark. 171"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 51,
    "char_count": 378,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.695,
    "sha256": "2e1eae48adc2556bfd4ef2bb4e433beeb745793becb84ef8acc4987d9cbf7ecf",
    "simhash": "1:8dba048712915120",
    "word_count": 60
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:24:40.922971+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Hathaway v. Werner."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe appellant has not complied with the-rules by filing an abstract and briefs. The submission was inadvertently taken; it will be set aside and the appeal dismissed.\nIt is so ordered.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "O. P. Lyles, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Hathaway v. Werner.\nRoles of Supreme Court : Dismissal for non-comfliance with.\nAPPEAL from Crittenden. Circuit Court in Chancery.\nJ. E. Riddick, Judge.\nO. P. Lyles, for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0171-01",
  "first_page_order": 199,
  "last_page_order": 199
}