{
  "id": 1913385,
  "name": "Bell v. Wilson",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bell v. Wilson",
  "decision_date": "1889-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "173",
  "last_page": "173",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "52 Ark. 173"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 56,
    "char_count": 391,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.77,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.159551614682296e-08,
      "percentile": 0.32484480755441725
    },
    "sha256": "7104a25d3169901aaf7e979aae284770f15792b6577cbc7b56cc678bc54c4e7f",
    "simhash": "1:ef09cd26867dd399",
    "word_count": 71
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:24:40.922971+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Bell v. Wilson."
    ],
    "opinions": [],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Bell v. Wilson.\nOpinion on motion for reconsideration.\nIt is not ruled in this case, as counsel seems to suppose, that a subsequent creditor .or purchaser may not attack the deed of Moore as a fraud upon his rights. See Adams v.. Edgerton, 48 Ark., 41Q ; Driggs v. Norwood, go Ark., 42. It is only determined that the Allen decree was not evidence of\" that fact in this suit.\nMotion denied."
  },
  "file_name": "0173-01",
  "first_page_order": 201,
  "last_page_order": 201
}