{
  "id": 1911705,
  "name": "Waggoner v. Fogleman",
  "name_abbreviation": "Waggoner v. Fogleman",
  "decision_date": "1890-04-26",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "181",
  "last_page": "181",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "53 Ark. 181"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "30 Ark., 718",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "25 Ark., 541",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1864578
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/25/0541-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "47 Ark., 44",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "24 Ark., 235",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8726787
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/24/0235-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 107,
    "char_count": 1161,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.722,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.8006015605381878e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7163782521683697
    },
    "sha256": "5fa6a299ca3369ac46e366dc1ea2df4dde15b760942abe8ced6a2a68f71c0146",
    "simhash": "1:2cb6a9e83ae47d8e",
    "word_count": 195
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:24:25.796000+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Waggoner v. Fogleman."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAn affidavit for a warning order upon the ground of non-residence, like an affidavit for attachment, must state the fact of the defendant\u2019s non-residence, and not the belief of the fact only. Hollman v. Fowler, 24 Ark., 235. An order published on such affidavit may be avoided on appeal. Sannoner v. Jacobson, 47 Ark., 44-5.\nThe affidavit in this case was made upon belief only. The judgment will therefore be reversed. The appellant having entered her appearance by the appeal is now in court, and no urther service is required.\nReverse.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. M. Randolph for appellant.",
      "O. P. Lyles for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Waggoner v. Fogleman.\nDecided April 26, 1890.\nWarning order \u2014 Non-residence\u2014Affidavit on belief.\nAn affidavit for a warning order upon the ground of, non-residence must state the fact of defendant\u2019s non-residence, and not the belief of that fact only.\nAPPEAL from Crittenden Circuit Court in Chancery.\nJ. E. Riddick, Judge.\nW. M. Randolph for appellant.\nThe affidavit for the warning order was upon belief only, when it should have been upon the knowledge of the affiant. Mansf. Dig., secs. 4989, 5\u00b0S5) e<;c- The judgment was void. 25 Ark., 541; Mansf. Dig,, sec. 5201; 30 Ark., 718.\nO. P. Lyles for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0181-01",
  "first_page_order": 205,
  "last_page_order": 205
}