{
  "id": 1322218,
  "name": "Hawkins v. State",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hawkins v. State",
  "decision_date": "1892-01-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "353",
  "last_page": "354",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "55 Ark. 353"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "47 Ark., 476",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1888691
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/47/0476-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 138,
    "char_count": 1693,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.766,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.138363859351185e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4700741240126355
    },
    "sha256": "d668667d460e0e887215f937a9c13a1db3390ad5240056e057f2e749cedc6330",
    "simhash": "1:3b09544160573641",
    "word_count": 266
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:46:22.231955+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Hawkins v. State."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Hemingway, J.\nUnder the statute which provides that every person who shall \u201c maliciously sever from the freehold any produce thereof or anything attached thereto shall upon conviction be adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor\u201d (Mansf. Digest, sec. 1658), an indictment which charges that the defendants \u201d maliciously did sever from the freehold five watermelons, of the value of twenty-five cents each, of the property of Smith Madewells \u201d contains a sufficient allegation of ownership to describe and identify the offense and to sustain a judgment of conviction. The sufficiency of the indictment in this respect being the only matter urged for a reversal, the judgment is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Hemingway, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "The appellants, pro se.",
      "W. E. Atkinson, Attorney General, and Charles T. Coleman for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Hawkins v. State.\nDecided January 23, 1892.\nMalicious mischief\u2014Severing produce from the freehold.\nAn indictment under Mansfield\u2019s Digest, section 1658, which charges that defendant maliciously did sever from the freehold five watermelons of value named, of the property of a person named, contains a sufficient allegation of ownership.\nAPPEAL from Marion Circuit Court.\nB. B. Hudgins, Judge.\nJohn Hawkins and two others were convicted under an indictment which charged that they \u201c unlawfully and maliciously did sever from the freehold five watermelons of the value of twenty-five cents each, of the property of Smith Madewells.\u201d A motion in arrest of judgment was overruled, and they appealed.\nThe appellants, pro se.\nThe indictment is insufficient in not alleging the ownership of the freehold.\nW. E. Atkinson, Attorney General, and Charles T. Coleman for appellee.\nIt is sufficient to follow the language of the statute. Mansf. Dig., sec. 1658; 47 Ark., 476; 45 id., 173; 41 id., 226; 40 id., 361; 39 id., 216."
  },
  "file_name": "0353-01",
  "first_page_order": 377,
  "last_page_order": 378
}