{
  "id": 8726909,
  "name": "Jordan et al. vs. Jennings",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jordan v. Jennings",
  "decision_date": "1846-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "95",
  "last_page": "96",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "7 Ark. 95"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "5 Ark. Rep. 409",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8727456
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/5/0409-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 70,
    "char_count": 623,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.442,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20861853335850855
    },
    "sha256": "0784bce4be2f31ec3152a96d72b51ab2b952e74ce93f1423947b133bea1f2fc8",
    "simhash": "1:5235c27928c88492",
    "word_count": 109
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:42:58.213020+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Jordan et al. vs. Jennings."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Cross, J.\nThe judgment rendered in this ease by the circuit Court was on motion upon a forfeited delivery bond, and- is in conflict with the principles heretofore settled in the cases of McKnight vs. Smith, 5 Ark. Rep. 409, and Pelham et al. vs. Page, 1 English\u2019s Rep. 148. The judgment therefore must be reversed with costs and the cause remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Cross, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Watkins & Corran, for plaintiffs.",
      "Pike & Baldwin, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Jordan et al. vs. Jennings.\n\u00edbe points raised in this case were settled in McKnight vs. Smith, 5 Ark. Rep.-409-,- and Pelham et al. vs. Page, 1 English's Rep. 148.\nWrit of Error to the Circuit Court of Clark county.\nWatkins & Corran, for plaintiffs.\nPike & Baldwin, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0095-01",
  "first_page_order": 95,
  "last_page_order": 96
}
