{
  "id": 8726945,
  "name": "Allen vs. State Bank",
  "name_abbreviation": "Allen v. State Bank",
  "decision_date": "1846-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "103",
  "last_page": "103",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "7 Ark. 103"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 110,
    "char_count": 1062,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.444,
    "sha256": "0ce1b3fceb66903ede7a79b0ca3ac272fe6e7495ad8f85bbbb61a082d0849c42",
    "simhash": "1:a854d1e1bd5e066c",
    "word_count": 182
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:42:58.213020+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Allen vs. State Bank."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Johnson, C. J.\nThis court has already passed upon every question involved in this case. See Pike vs. Lytle, 1 English's Rep. 212. We deem it unnecessary to re-argue the points presented as the two cases are precisely analogous, and rest upon the same principles of law. It is all sufficient to refer to the decision in that case for an argument strictly applicable to this. Judgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Johnson, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Fowler, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Lincoln, contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Allen vs. State Bank.\n\u00ed*ike vs. Lytle, I English\u2019s R. 212 cited, and approved.\nWrit of Error to the Circuit Court of Pulaski County.\nThe Bank of the State of Arkansas having recovered judgment against Powell et al. in the Pulaski circuit court, sued out a writ of Garnishment to St. Francis county against Allen and others. Allen made default, and judgment was rendered against him for the amount of the orignal judgment, at the May term 1845.\nHe brought error, and assigned for error, among other things, that the writ of garnishment improperly issued to St. Francis county, beyond the local jurisdiction of the court.\nFowler, for plaintiff in error.\nLincoln, contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0103-01",
  "first_page_order": 103,
  "last_page_order": 103
}