{
  "id": 1509506,
  "name": "Bluff City Lumber Company v. Floyd",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bluff City Lumber Co. v. Floyd",
  "decision_date": "1902-05-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "418",
  "last_page": "420",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "70 Ark. 418"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "64 Ark. 492",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1907372
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/64/0492-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "48 Ark. 151",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1887747
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/48/0151-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "31 Ark. 470",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1879306
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/31/0470-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "17 Ark. 546",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8726748,
        8726725
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/17/0546-02",
        "/ark/17/0546-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "5 Ark. 426",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "48 Ark. 476",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1887725
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/48/0476-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "135 Mass. 306",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Mass.",
      "case_ids": [
        724620
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/mass/135/0306-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "67 Ark. 80",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1152552
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/67/0080-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "40 Ark. 283",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1897233
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/40/0283-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "56 Ark. 222",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 Ark. 82",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8727443
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/11/0082-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "31 Ark. 579",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "43 Ark. 491",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "67 Ark. 531",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1152510
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/67/0531-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "28 Ark. 8",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1884422
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/28/0008-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "38 Ark. 539",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "33 Ark. 97",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8721939
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/33/0097-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "60 Ark. 256",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "53 Ark. 250",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1911720
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/53/0250-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "46 Ark. 462",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "55 Ark. 485",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1322261
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/55/0485-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "59 Ark. 291",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "68 Ark. 79",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 Ark. 212",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8727607
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/11/0212-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "60 Ark. 250",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1903724
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "258"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/60/0250-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "65 Ark. 278",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        609330
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "285"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/65/0278-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 278,
    "char_count": 3538,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.525,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.1005537022731786e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7617388117994524
    },
    "sha256": "d2d068a26c1df409c683d727ebd174b4d30c2e4ce559135c30e4bea7865b8768",
    "simhash": "1:f1a3ceb864176031",
    "word_count": 636
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:54:44.617258+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Bluff City Lumber Company v. Floyd."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Battle, J.\nThis was an action of unlawful detainer. The issues in the case were, by consent of the parties, tried by the court; trial by jury being waived. The court filed its conclusions of fact and of law, separately, in writing. There were no exceptions to the conclusions of law. The defendant recovered judgment; and the plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial, and for cause stated: \u201c(1) That the findings of the court and judgment are contrary to the law; (2) that the findings of the court and judgment are contrary to the evidence; (3) that the findings of the court and judgment are contrary to the law and evidence.\u201d The motion was overruled, and the plaintiff appealed.\n\u201cThe objection that the court\u2019s finding of facts is not sustained by evidence may be made by motion for new trial, no exceptions at the time the finding is made being necessary.\u201d White v. Beal & Fletcher Grocer Company, 65 Ark. 278, 285. In this case the appellant concedes that \u201cthe findings of the facts by the court, so-far as they go, are correct.\u201d The rule as to the court\u2019s conclusions of law is different. In the language of the court in Dunnington v. Frick Company, 60 Ark. 250, 258, \u201cAs there was no exception to the court\u2019s conclusions of law, * * * they cannot be reviewed here.\u201d\nThere being nothing before us for review, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Battle, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bridges \u00a3 Wooldridge, for appellant.",
      "Irving lieinberger, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Bluff City Lumber Company v. Floyd.\nOpinion delivered May 10, 1902.\nAppeal \u2014 Court\u2019s Findings \u2014 Exceptions.\u2014While the objection, that the court\u2019s finding of fact is not sustained by evidence may be made by motion for new trial, without exception being saved at the time the finding is made, the rule is otherwise as to the court\u2019s conclusions of law, which must be excepted to as well as made grounds of motion for new trial.\nAppeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.\nAntonio B. Grace, Judge.\nAffirmed.\nBridges \u00a3 Wooldridge, for appellant.\nHomesteads are not exempt from sales made to enforce mechanics\u2019 liens. Const. 1874, art. 9, \u00a7 3; Sand. & H. Dig., \u00a7 3710. Dower is a potential interest, and does not give possession until it is assigned. 11 Ark. 212. The homestead was abandoned. 68 Ark. 79.\nIrving lieinberger, for appellee.\nThe bill of exceptions is not complete. 59 Ark. 291; id. 178. The amendments are a necessity. Sand. & H. Dig., \u00a7 5845. The exceptions were not properly saved. 55 Ark. 485; 46 Ark. 462; 53 Ark. 250. As amended, the record is wholly defective. 60 Ark. 256; 33 Ark. 97; 38 Ark. 539; id. 339; 28 Ark. 8; 67 Ark. 531; 43 Ark. 491. Appellant\u2019s sale did not bar appellee\u2019s right to dower. Sand. & H. Dig., \u00a7 2535; Phillips, Mech. Lien, \u00a7 195; 31 Ark. 579; 11 Ark. 82; 56 Ark. 222; Sand. & H. Dig., \u00a7 4741; 40 Ark. 283; Sand. & H. Dig., \u00a7 18. Appellee\u2019s sale was not a mechanic\u2019s lien sale, or, if it was, it was irregular and void. Sand. & H. Dig., \u00a7\u00a7 5858, 4744, 3710, 3694, 3714, 4741. Appellee was a necessary party to sell homestead under mechanics\u2019 lien. Thomp. Home. \u00a7 374. The sale was void because it was authorized on a dies non. 67 Ark. 80; 16 Am. & Eng. Enc. 818; 44 Am. Eep. 756; 135 Mass. 306. The sale was void. 48 Ark. 476; 5 Ark. 426. Appellee was not estopped to deny appellant\u2019s right to dispossess her because her husband had attorned to it. 17 Ark. 546; 31 Ark. 470; Thomp. Home. \u00a7 470. Neither appellee nor her husband was served with process, and the judgment was coram non judice. 48 Ark. 151. The dower and homestead rights were not in issue or ordered sold. 64 Ark. 492. 'The question of damages cannot now be raised. 33 Ark. 97."
  },
  "file_name": "0418-01",
  "first_page_order": 434,
  "last_page_order": 436
}