{
  "id": 1503955,
  "name": "Garner v. State",
  "name_abbreviation": "Garner v. State",
  "decision_date": "1905-01-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "487",
  "last_page": "488",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "73 Ark. 487"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "61 Ark. 62",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1902334
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/61/0062-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "64 Ark. 467",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1907438
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/64/0467-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "48 Ark. 66",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1887716
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/48/0066-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "108 Ind. 47",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ind.",
      "case_ids": [
        1971716
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ind/108/0047-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "16 Ark. 567",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "19 Ark. 143",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8725378
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "566"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/19/0143-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "37 Ark. 96",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1870925
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/37/0096-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "47 L. R. A. 144",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "L.R.A.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "17 Wall. 168",
      "category": "reporters:scotus_early",
      "reporter": "Wall.",
      "case_ids": [
        62520
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/84/0168-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 185,
    "char_count": 2076,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.714,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.1272882239739114e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5749130547765526
    },
    "sha256": "5b6b7865f9d35b9978eac36d91725399d9ead480061d06176c595424894ce8ed",
    "simhash": "1:32736a1e8b85f219",
    "word_count": 359
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:58:55.652140+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "McCuuuoch, J., did not participate."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Garner v. State."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Battue, J.\nIs the following indictment, omitting caption, sufficient:\n\u201cThe grand jury of Garland County, in the name 'and by the authority of the State of Arkansas, accuse Tom Garner of the crime of carnal abuse, committed as follows, towit, the said Tom Garner, in the county and State aforesaid, on the 20th day of February, A. D. 1904, feloniously did' carnally know and abuse one Ada Tucker, the said Ada Tucker then and there being a female under the age of sixteen years, against the peace and dignity of the State of Arkansas?\u201d It is contended that this indictment is defective, because it does not allege that Ada Tucker was not the wife of the defendant.' .This is not necessary. The allegation that he \u201cfeloniously did carnally know and abuse\u201d her negatives such an idea. This allegation could not be true if they were husband and wife. The indictment, contains \u201ca statement of the acts constituting the offense, in ordinary. and concise language, and in such a manner as to enable a person of common understanding to know what is intended\u201d (Kirby\u2019s Dig. \u00a7 2243) ; and is sufficient.\nJudgment affirmed.\nMcCuuuoch, J., did not participate.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Battue, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "M. S. Cobb, for appellant.",
      "George W. Murphy, Attorney General, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Garner v. State.\nOpinion delivered January 7, 1905.\nCarnae abuse \u2014 sufficiency oe indictment. \u2014 An indictment for carnal abuse, which alleges that defendant \u201cfeloniously did carnally know and abuse one A, the said A then and there being a female under the age of 16 years, against the peace,\u201d etc., is sufficient without alleging that said A was not the wife of defendant.\nAppeal from Garland Circuit Court.\nAlexander M. Dueeie, Judge.\nAffirmed.\nM. S. Cobb, for appellant.\nThe indictment was insufficient. Whar. Cr. PI. \u00a7 241.-When the negative is descriptive of the offense, it must be alleged in the indictment. Bish. Cr. .Pro. \u00a7 \u00a7 633-637; 17 Wall. 168; 47 L. R. A. 144; 37 Ark. 96; 19 Ark. 143, 566; 16 Ark. 567-\nGeorge W. Murphy, Attorney General, for appellee.\nThe indictment, being substantially in the words of the statute, is sufficient. 1 \u00bbBish. New Cr. Pro. .\u00a7 613; 108 Ind. 47; 48 Ark. 66; 64 Ark. 467; 61 Ark. 62."
  },
  "file_name": "0487-01",
  "first_page_order": 509,
  "last_page_order": 510
}