{
  "id": 8718651,
  "name": "Moody v. Rogers",
  "name_abbreviation": "Moody v. Rogers",
  "decision_date": "1905-02-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "132",
  "last_page": "133",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "74 Ark. 132"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 137,
    "char_count": 1637,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.699,
    "sha256": "fcd5e6974d29638c2336c68869207741fbdf2424b68fd0b6c9bdd70a45125506",
    "simhash": "1:621a9f276aeb2b30",
    "word_count": 276
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:33:00.876147+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Styles T. Rowe, Judge."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Moody v. Rogers."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Wood, J.,\n(after stating the facts.) It does not appear that the writ was for the purpose of enforcing any order or judgment of the court. The proceedings therefore as to notice are controlled by section 4481 of Kirby\u2019s Digest, which requires ten days\u2019 notice after filing the petition before the motion for mandamus is made. See Kirby\u2019s Digest, \u00a7 5158.\nReversed and remanded for further proceedings.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Wood, J.,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "T. B. Pryor, for appellants.",
      "George S. Evans, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Moody v. Rogers.\nOpinion delivered February 4, 1905.\nMandamus \u2014 notice. \u2014 Under Kirby\u2019s Digest, \u00a7 5158, providing .that writs of mandamus, except where used by a court for enforcing its judgments and orders, shall be obtained by motion, and Id. \u00a7 4481, providing that notice of such motion shall be served upon the party against whom the judgment or order is sought at least ten days before that motion is made, an order granting a writ of mandamus on less than ten days\u2019 notice will be set aside on appeal.\nAppeal from .Sebastian Circuit Court, Greenwood District.\nStyles T. Rowe, Judge.\nReversed.\nSTATEMENT BY THE COURT.\nThis is an appeal from an order of the circuit court granting a writ of mandamus against Jake Moody and John Moss, mayor and recorder, respectively, of the town of Hartford, commanding them to issue liquor licenses to appellees, etc. Petition for the writ was.filed Jantiary 9, 1905. Notice that application would be made to the court for the writ on January 21, 1905, and was served on the appellants January 19, 1905. The order granting the writ was made January 21, 1905.\nAppellants appeared only for the purpose of suggesting want of jurisdiction.\nT. B. Pryor, for appellants.\nGeorge S. Evans, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0132-01",
  "first_page_order": 153,
  "last_page_order": 154
}