{
  "id": 1497307,
  "name": "Driver v. Planters' Mutual Insurance Association of Arkansas",
  "name_abbreviation": "Driver v. Planters' Mutual Insurance Ass'n",
  "decision_date": "1906-03-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "127",
  "last_page": "129",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "78 Ark. 127"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "17 Atl. 50",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "A.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "120 Pa. St. 453",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Pa.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Cal. 83",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Cal.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "31 Mich. 230",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Mich.",
      "case_ids": [
        1319646
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "232"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/mich/31/0230-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "57 Ala. 20",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ala.",
      "case_ids": [
        3177777
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ala/57/0020-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "120 Pa. 441",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Pa.",
      "case_ids": [
        559926
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/pa/120/0441-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "15 Johns. 224",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Johns.",
      "case_ids": [
        2140993
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/johns/15/0224-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "85 Mo. 173",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Mo.",
      "case_ids": [
        422178
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/mo/85/0173-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "40 Kan. 744",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Kan.",
      "case_ids": [
        8866597
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/kan/40/0744-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "94 Am. Dec. 51",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "Am. Dec.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "38 Am. St. Rep. 526",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Am. St. Rep.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "52 Minn. 83",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Minn.",
      "case_ids": [
        772663
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/minn/52/0083-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "6 Humph. 62",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Hum.",
      "case_ids": [
        11266089
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/tenn/25/0062-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "70 Ga. 381",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ga.",
      "case_ids": [
        27643
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ga/70/0381-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "57 Ga. 446",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ga.",
      "case_ids": [
        580467
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ga/57/0446-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "7 Cal. 81",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Cal.",
      "case_ids": [
        2236817
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/cal/7/0081-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "47 Pa. St. 249",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Pa.",
      "case_ids": [
        485545
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/pa/47/0249-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "64 Ark. 119",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1907444
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/64/0119-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "31 Mich. 230",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Mich.",
      "case_ids": [
        1319646
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/mich/31/0230-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "120 Pa. 441",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Pa.",
      "case_ids": [
        559926
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "453"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/pa/120/0441-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 288,
    "char_count": 3998,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.709,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.087085966315723e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3767638576611996
    },
    "sha256": "f66dc7afb2c5d796572859245ae68ec7419a796c764c929f6f5af6db9a29987d",
    "simhash": "1:3171dd62baf2d97b",
    "word_count": 734
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:50:05.844603+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Driver v. Planters\u2019 Mutual Insurance Association of Arkansas."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Battle, J.\nPlanters\u2019 Mutual Insurance Association of Arkansas insured certain property of Jettie Driver against fire, and received his note for $88 for the premium. The policy of insurance in reference to the note provided: \u201cIf paid on or before'maturity, all interest waived, said amount being for cash premium on my insurance this day applied for; and it is further agreed that, if this note is not paid at maturity, the whole amount of assessment on said insurance shall be considered as earned, and the contract be null and void, so long as this note remains overdue and unpaid.\u201d\nThe property insured was destroyed by fire. The question is, was the note paid ?\nThe note was sent to the bank at Osceola, Arkansas, about the latter part of October, 1903, for collection. The insurance company and the bank notified Driver that the note was sent there. The proof on the part of Driver was that he went to Osceola after he had been notified and before the fire; that he \u201cwent to the bank and found no one there, but he met the cashier some two hundred yards from the bank, and told him to pay the note, and he promised to do so; that Driver had money on deposit in the bank sufficient to cover the note; that no check was drawn,\u2019, and no entries made on the books of the bank charging Driver with the amount of said note, and no credit given to the Insurance Company until after the fire occurred. Several days, and perhaps several weeks, according to the contention of Driver, had intervened between the time he told the cashier to pay the note and the date of the fire, and he made no effort to see whether the note had really been paid or not until after the fire.\u201d\nThe money to the credit of Driver in the bank was never applied to the payment of the note. The bank gave no credit to the insurance company on its books for the note or charged Driver with the amount thereof until after the fire, but until then treated it as unpaid and uncollected. There was no payment. Hatch v. Hutchinson, 64 Ark. 119; Sutherland v. First National Bank of Ypsilanti, 31 Mich. 230; Hecksher v. Shoemaker, 47 Pa. St. 249; Phillips v. Mayer, 7 Cal. 81; Cavanaugh v. Buehler, 120 Pa. St. 441, 453; Pease v. Dibble, 57 Ga. 446; Price v. White, 70 Ga. 381; Kenny v. Hazeltine, 6 Humph. 62.\nThe effort to pay the note after the fire was too late to save the insurance.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Battle, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. J. Lamb, for appellant.",
      "J. W. & M. House, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Driver v. Planters\u2019 Mutual Insurance Association of Arkansas.\nOpinion delivered March 3, 1906.\nFire insurance \u2014 payment.\u2014Where a policy of fire insurance provided that it should not be binding so long as the premium note remained unpaid, evidence that insured, on being notified by a bank that the premium note was held by it for collection, went to the bank, where he had funds sufficient to pay it, and notified the cashier to pay the note, but that he drew no check in payment, and that no entry was made on the bank\u2019s books, and no credit was given to the insurance company until after the fire occurred, was insufficient to prove payment.\nAppeal from Mississippi Circuit Court; Allen Hughes, Judge;\naffirmed.\nW. J. Lamb, for appellant.\nIf, having money on deposit in the bank sufficient for the purpose, plaintiff requested the cashier to apply the money on deposit to the payment of the note, which the cashier agreed to do, this would constitute a payment, even though the cashier failed to remit it to the defendant. 52 Minn. 83; 38 Am. St. Rep. 526; 94 Am. Dec. 51.\nJ. W. & M. House, for appellee.\nThere was no payment. The money on deposit was under plaintiff\u2019s dominion, subject to his order at all times until after it was appropriated, which was not done until after the fire. 2 Jones\u2019 Daw (N. C.), 199; 40 Kan. 744; 85 Mo. 173; 12 N. Y. Sup. 433; 15 Johns. 224; 120 Pa. 441; 57 Ala. 20; 2 Watts & Serg. (Pa.), 70. It was plaintiff\u2019s duty to see that his agent, the cashier, made the application of the money in payment of the note. 31 Mich. 230, 232; 7 Cal. 83; 120 Pa. St. 453; 22 Gratt. (Va.), 352; 17 Atl. 50."
  },
  "file_name": "0127-01",
  "first_page_order": 147,
  "last_page_order": 149
}