{
  "id": 1529000,
  "name": "Van Patten v. Wank",
  "name_abbreviation": "Van Patten v. Wank",
  "decision_date": "1907-04-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "547",
  "last_page": "547",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "82 Ark. 547"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "76 Ark. 138",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1500966
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/76/0138-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "75 Ark. 571",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1502422
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/75/0571-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "57 Ark. 304",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1324576
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/57/0304-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 91,
    "char_count": 764,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.623,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.057212601970230696
    },
    "sha256": "9ee5930ac8a037a86a9810a484f07cae186761adf46037b39a7aae131dd4bf0f",
    "simhash": "1:ce11d73888368db9",
    "word_count": 126
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:52:32.340981+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Van Patten v. Wank."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER Curiam.\nThe abstract of the appellant in this case is so deficient that the court is unable to ascertain the facts without exploring the record, which the oourt must decline' to do, as explained in Ruble v. Helm, 57 Ark. 304. See also applications to this rule in the following cases: Shorter University v. Franklin, 75 Ark. 571; Beavers v. Security Mutual Ins. Co., 76 Ark. 138.\nFor these reasons the judgment is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "R. G. Davies, for appellant.",
      "T. M. Hooker and C. V. Teague, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Van Patten v. Wank.\nOpinion delivered April 29, 1907.\nAppeal \u2014 insufficiency of abstract. \u2014 Where appellant\u2019s abstract is insufficient, the court will not explore the transcript for errors.\nAppeal from Garland Circuit Court; Alexander M. Dui\u00f1e, Judge;\naffirmed.\nR. G. Davies, for appellant.\nT. M. Hooker and C. V. Teague, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0547-01",
  "first_page_order": 567,
  "last_page_order": 567
}