{
  "id": 1521453,
  "name": "Ward v. Sturdivant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ward v. Sturdivant",
  "decision_date": "1908-04-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "103",
  "last_page": "104",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "86 Ark. 103"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "84 Ark. 95",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1524458
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/84/0095-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "84 Ark. 73",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1524520
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/84/0073-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "80 Ark. 528",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1491230
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/80/0528-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "79 Ark. 338",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1495630
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/79/0338-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "78 Ark. 7",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1497232
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/78/0007-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "76 Ark. 41",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1500985
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/76/0041-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "75 Ark. 181",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1502481
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/75/0181-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "60 Ark. 250",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1903724
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/60/0250-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "59 Ark. 312",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1327671
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "370"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/59/0312-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "54 Ark. 16",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1320428
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/54/0016-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "39 Ark. 337",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1898641
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/39/0337-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "38 Ark. 528",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1900512
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/38/0528-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "59 Ark. 370",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1327667
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "375"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/59/0370-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "84 Ark. 95",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1524458
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/84/0095-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "84 Ark. 73",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1524520
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/84/0073-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "80 Ark. 528",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1491230
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "535"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/80/0528-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "79 Ark. 338",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1495630
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "341"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/79/0338-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "78 Ark. 7",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1497232
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "14"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/78/0007-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "76 Ark. 41",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1500985
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "42"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/76/0041-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "75 Ark. 181",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1502481
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "183"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/75/0181-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "60 Ark. 250",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1903724
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "256"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/60/0250-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "59 Ark. 312",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1327671
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "314"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/59/0312-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "54 Ark. 16",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1320428
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "20"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/54/0016-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "39 Ark. 337",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1898641
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "339"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/39/0337-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "38 Ark. 528",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1900512
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "539"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/38/0528-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 255,
    "char_count": 3349,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.709,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2933933944064825e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6204357860245906
    },
    "sha256": "576f41bf9dc03285036c735815c729a1f6f3a018e9dcc8ffa7179fd7f1d82888",
    "simhash": "1:3a891d2a113c6e0a",
    "word_count": 594
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:16:59.018039+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ward v. Sturdivant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Wood, J.\nThis suit was brought by the appellant against the appellee for the possession of a certain tract of land in Howard County. Appellant claimed under a sheriff\u2019s deed issued by virtue of a sale of the land under execution to satisfy a judgment in favor of appellant against one J. B. Sturdivant.\nAppellant alleged that J. B. Sturdivant sold the land in controversy to W. A. J. Sturdivant for the fraudulent purpose of cheating, hindering and delaying, his creditors, of whom appellant was one. The appellee, W. A. Sturdivant, denied that the land in controversy was sold for the fraudulent purpose of hindering and delaying creditors, and alleged that the land in controversy was bought by him from J. B. Sturdivant in good faith and for a valuable consideration, and he claims under deed from J. B. Sturdivant, and set up title under said deed, and by virtue of the seven years statute of limitations.\nOn behalf of appellant the evidence tended to prove the allegations of her complaint, and on behalf of appellee there was evidence tending to sustain the allegations of his answer.\nThese were issues of fact, which were submitted to the jury under instructions to which no specific objections were pointed out in the trial court. The instructions were numbered from one -to eleven respectively.\nThe appellant, the record shows, \u201cexcepted to all of said instructions, but the court gave same over the objections\u201d of appellant. This presents no specific objection to any one of the instructions, and we find that some, if not all, of them are correct. Atkins v. Swope, 38 Ark. 528, 539; Neal v. Peevey, 39 Ark. 337, 339; Quertermous v. Hatfield, 54 Ark. 16, 20; Fordyce v. Russell, 59 Ark. 312, 314; Oxley Stave Co. v. Staggs, 59 Ark. 370, 375; Dunnington v. Frick Co, 60 Ark. 250, 256; Young v. Stevenson, 75 Ark. 181, 183; Wells v. Parker, 76 Ark. 41, 42; Wade v. Goza, 78 Ark. 7, 14; Walnut Ridge Mer. Co. v. Cohn, 79 Ark. 338, 341; Kansas City S. Ry. Co. v. Morris, 80 Ark. 528, 535; Mathews v. State, 84 Ark. 73; Johnson v. State, 84 Ark. 95.\nAppellant objected to the ruling of the court in refusing to give \u201ceach and every one of her requests for instructions, and duly saved her exceptions thereto.\u201d But she does not urge here any specific reason why the court should have given any one or all of these requests. We find that the instructions of the court, upon the. whole, were a correct application of the law of,the case to the facts; and, as there was evidence here to sustain the verdict, the judgment is affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Wood, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. V. Tompkins, D. B. Sain and W. P. Beazel, for appellant.",
      "W. C. Rodgers, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ward v. Sturdivant.\nOpinion delivered April 20, 1908.\nAppeal \u2014 instructions\u2014exception in gross. \u2014 Where the appellant excepted in gross to several instructions given, the court will look' no further upon ascertaining that any one of them was correct.\nAppeal from Howard Circuit Court; W. S. Bakin, Special Judge;\naffirmed.\nW. V. Tompkins, D. B. Sain and W. P. Beazel, for appellant.\nW. C. Rodgers, for appellee.\nAppellant\u2019s objection to the court\u2019s refusal to give instructions is too general. Likewise as to the instructions given by the court, the statement that \u201cplaintiff excepted to all of said instructions\u201d is too general, and can not avail here. 38 Ark. 528; 39 Ark. 337; 54 Ark. 16; 59 Ark. 312; Id. 370; 60 Ark. 250; 75 Ark. 181; 76 Ark. 41; 78 Ark. 7; 79 Ark. 338;' 80 Ark. 528; 84 Ark. 73; 84 Ark. 95."
  },
  "file_name": "0103-01",
  "first_page_order": 125,
  "last_page_order": 126
}