{
  "id": 1511771,
  "name": "Edland v. State",
  "name_abbreviation": "Edland v. State",
  "decision_date": "1909-06-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "243",
  "last_page": "245",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "91 Ark. 243"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "69 Ark. 376",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8723298
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/69/0376-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "67 Ark. 566",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "63 Ark. 576",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8724691
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/63/0576-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "75 Ark. 126",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "48 Ark. 307",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "37 Ark. 495",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "29 Ark. 354",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1882927
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/29/0354-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "25 Ark. 101",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1864540
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/25/0101-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "24 Ark. 165",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "22 Ark. 369",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8726831
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/22/0369-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 Ark. 44",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8727418
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/11/0044-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "3 Ark. 285",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8728455
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/3/0285-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "147 U. S. 494",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "U.S.",
      "case_ids": [
        3566015
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/147/0494-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "12 Wheaton 419",
      "category": "reporters:scotus_early",
      "reporter": "Wheat.",
      "case_ids": [
        1429870
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/us/25/0419-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "68 Vt. 338",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Vt.",
      "case_ids": [
        4456982
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/vt/68/0338-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "14 Col. 228",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Col.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "82 Ala. 209",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ala.",
      "case_ids": [
        3319770
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ala/82/0209-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "4 L. R. A. 742",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "L.R.A.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "87 Ala. 240",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ala.",
      "case_ids": [
        3363753
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ala/87/0240-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "126 Cal. 291",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Cal.",
      "case_ids": [
        2002264
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/cal/126/0291-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "1 L. R. A. 361",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "L.R.A.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "122 Pa. 627",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Pa.",
      "case_ids": [
        1948401
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/pa/122/0627-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "59 Ark. 237",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1327701
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/59/0237-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "47 Ark. 404",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1888694
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/47/0404-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "36 Ark. 331",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "73 Ark. 600",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1503971
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/73/0600-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "55 Ark. 389",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1322242
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/55/0389-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "89 Ark. 598",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1515179
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/89/0598-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 343,
    "char_count": 5360,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.689,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.237152232996125e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5108521770960391
    },
    "sha256": "cee11d3ad176c39274dbaa2bb818031663465b7a043dec6d6b7bdb8275f636d8",
    "simhash": "1:47a49d098fc555f0",
    "word_count": 982
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:22:42.866546+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edland v. State."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Battre, J.\nOn the 6th day of November, 1908, appellants, J. E. Edland and J. B. Ullathorne, were arrested and tried before a justice of the peace of Big Lake Township, in Mississippi County, Arkansas, for having \u25a0 hunted within the Chickasawba District of that county, in violation of. section 3599 of Kirby\u2019s Digest, they being non-residents. They appealed to the circuit court of Chickasawba District, and were again convicted; and they then appealed to this court.\nThey concede that, if section 3599 of Kirby\u2019s Digest is in force in Mississippi County, they were properly convicted.\nSection 3599 of Kirby\u2019s Digest is as follows; \u201cIt shall be unlawful for any person who is a non-resident of the State of Arkansas to shoot, hunt, fish or trap at any season of the year.\u201d\nThe question is, is this statute in force in Mississippi County?\nSection 3599 of Kirby\u2019s Digest is section four of an act entitled \u201cAn act to protect the game and fish of the State and provide for the appointment of game wardens,\u201d approved April 24, 1903. Section eleven of that act was as follows: \u201cThat all laws or parts of laws in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and this act shall take effect and b'e in force from and after its passage; provided, that the provisions of this act shall not apply to the county of- Mississippi.\u201d\nAppellants contend that this provision is still in force in Mississippi County. But it was repealed by an act entitled \u201cAn act to amend section 11 of Act No. 162, approved April 24, 1903, entitled \u2018An act to protect the game and fish of the State, and to provide for the appointment of game wardens;\u2019 \u201d approved April 19, 1905, which is as follows:\n\u201cBe it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas: Section 1. That Section eleven of Act No. 162, approved April 24, 1903, entitled \u2018An act to protect the game and fish of the State, and to provide for the appointment of game wardens/ be amended so that the provisions in said section exempting Mississippi County be, and the same is hereby repealed, and that section be amended so as to read as follows:\n\u201cSection 2. That all laws and parts of laws in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.\n\u201cSection 3. That all laws and parts of laws in conflict with this act be, and the same are hereby repealed, and this act shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.\u201d\nThe figure 2 in the last clause of section one is evidently a rhistake. It should be n. It (last clause) was not an independent section, but a part of section r.\nThe -effect of the amendment of section 11 of the act of April 24, 1903, by the act of April 19, 1905, was to so change the former act as to make it read in the same manner it would have read and to give it the same effect it would have had if it had been originally -enacted as amended, that is, as it would have read with the proviso to section eleven stricken out. Henderson v. Dearing, 89 Ark. 598; Mondschein v. State, 55 Ark. 389; Hempstead County v. Harkness, 73 Ark. 600.\nSection 3599 of Kirby\u2019s Digest is in force in Mississippi County.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Battre, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "R. P. Taylor, for appellants.",
      "Hal L. Norwood, Attorney General, and C. A. Cunningham, Assistant, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edland v. State.\nOpinion delivered June 28, 1909.\n1. Statutes \u2014 EFFECT of amendment. \u2014 The effect of an amendment to an act is to so change the former act as to make it read in the same manner it would have read and to give it the same effect it would have had if it had been originally enacted as amended. (Page 243.)\n2. FlSH AND GAME \u2014 EFFECT 0E AMENDING STATUTE. \u2014 Under Acts I9O3, C. 162, \u00a7 ti, the county of Mississippi was exempted from the operation of the act prohibiting nonresidents from hunting and fishing in this State. By Acts 1905, c. 185, this exemption was repealed. Held, that die effect of the amendment was to put Acts 1903, c. 162, in operation in Mississippi County. (Page 245.)\nAppeal from Mississippi Circuit Court, Chickasawba District; Frank Smith, Judge;\naffirmed.\nR. P. Taylor, for appellants.\nAct \\o. r85 of the Acts 1905 is invalid because it is ambiguous, and its construction is meaningless. 36 Ark. 331; 47 Ark. 404; 59 Ark. 237. Invalid also because it is violative of art. 5, \u00a7 22, Const. Under this constitutional provision the act of 1905 neither amends the section nor repeals the proviso. Section 1 of the act is to be looked to to see if it does either. What follows it is entirely disconnected from it, separately paragraphed and numbered as a separate section. It cannot, therefore, be viewed as a re-enactment of sec. 11, act No. 162, Acts 1903, 122 Pa. 627, 1 L. R. A. 361; 126 Cal. 291; 87 Ala. 240, 4 L. R. A. 742; 82 Ala. 209.\nHal L. Norwood, Attorney General, and C. A. Cunningham, Assistant, for appellee.\nWhere a provision which excepts a class or specific locality from the operation of an act is repealed, the law operates generally over the excepted class Or locality. 14 Col. 228; 68 Vt. 338; 12 Wheaton 419, 147 U. S. 494; 1 Lewis\u2019 Sutherland Stat. Int. 573; 2 Id. 672.\nThe intention of the Legislature will control the construction of the act, and a mere typographical error in numbering the sections will not defeat the operation of the act. Endlich, Int. Stat. \u00a7 \u00a7 295, 35, 8, 16, 4.0, 319, 329; 3 Ark. 285; 11 Ark. 44; 22 Ark. 369; 24 Ark. 165; 25 Ark. 101; 29 Ark. 354; 37 Ark. 495; 48 Ark. 307; 75 Ark. 126; 63 Ark. 576; 67 Ark. 566; 69 Ark. 376."
  },
  "file_name": "0243-01",
  "first_page_order": 263,
  "last_page_order": 265
}