{
  "id": 1511831,
  "name": "Judkins v. Myers",
  "name_abbreviation": "Judkins v. Myers",
  "decision_date": "1909-10-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "566",
  "last_page": "566",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "91 Ark. 566"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "87 Ark. 368",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1519085
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/87/0368-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "88 Ark. 449",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1517136
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/88/0449-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "89 Ark. 41",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1515211
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/89/0041-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "90 Ark. 161",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1513808
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "214, 230"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/90/0161-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1268,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.615,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3846421996334716e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6412294693628856
    },
    "sha256": "251f038531df3bab7e1eedf1b02b95fef09537ccd6d42e2e7b6ad166d44d1424",
    "simhash": "1:b3a0c14a01469df1",
    "word_count": 222
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:22:42.866546+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Judkins v. Myers."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Battue, J.\nOn the 29th day of January, 1908, the trial court overruled the appellants\u2019 motion for a new trial, and gave them six months within which to file a bill of exceptions. On the 30th day of July, 1908, at 58 minutes past 11 o\u2019clock p. m., they filed a bill of exceptions. It was then too late, and their bill of exceptions 'formed no part of the record, and there is nothing presented to us for consideration, the questions in the case being such as could be presented only by a bill of exceptions.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Battue, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "7. B. Judkins, for 'appellants.",
      "Campbell & Suits, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Judkins v. Myers.\nOpinion delivered October 11, 1909.\nBiff or FXCEpTions \u2014 timb foe fifing. \u2014 Where, 011 January 29, 1908, the trial court gave appellant '6 months in which to file a bill of exceptions, a bill filed on July 30 following was too late.\nAppeal from Gawrence Circuit Court, Western District; Bugene Lankford, Judge;\naffirmed.\n7. B. Judkins, for 'appellants.\nCampbell & Suits, for appellees.\nThe judgment should be affirmed because appellants have failed to present a sufficient abstract of the testimony and of the instructions given and refused. 90 Ark. 161, 214, 230,.393, 398; 89 Ark. 41; 88 Ark. 449; 87 Ark. 368. It should be affirmed because the bill of exceptions was not filed within the time allowed by the trial court."
  },
  "file_name": "0566-01",
  "first_page_order": 586,
  "last_page_order": 586
}