{
  "id": 1543610,
  "name": "Independence County v. Duffey",
  "name_abbreviation": "Independence County v. Duffey",
  "decision_date": "1910-06-13",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "352",
  "last_page": "354",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "95 Ark. 352"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ark.",
    "id": 8808,
    "name": "Arkansas Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 34,
    "name_long": "Arkansas",
    "name": "Ark."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "69 Ark. 521",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8724778
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/69/0521-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "65 Ark. 559",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        609307
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/65/0559-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "72 Ark. 195",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1505508
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/72/0195-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "70 Ark. 549",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1509476
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/70/0549-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "46 Ark. 96",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1890471
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/46/0096-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "59 Ark. 312",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1327671
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/59/0312-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "54 Ark. 216",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1320358
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/54/0216-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "49 Ark. 253",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1309210
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/49/0253-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "9 Ark. 535",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8727638
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/9/0535-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "56 Ark. 370",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1326071
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/56/0370-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "69 Ark. 376",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8723298
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/69/0376-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "65 Ark. 521",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        609340
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/65/0521-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "67 Ark. 566",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "71 Ark. 556",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1507866
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/71/0556-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "23 Ark. 107",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1866060
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/23/0107-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "25 Ark. 32",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1864571
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/25/0032-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "18 Ark. 449",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        8726580
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/18/0449-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "21 Ark. 265",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "weight": 2,
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "58 Ark. 250",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1329197
      ],
      "weight": 3,
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/58/0250-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "30 Ark. 533",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "72 Ark. 395",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "20 Ark. 573",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1869278
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "581"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/20/0573-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "20 Ark. 561",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ark.",
      "case_ids": [
        1869270
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ark/20/0561-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 333,
    "char_count": 5166,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.695,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.057719581334664684
    },
    "sha256": "3098e1f148a60e464d54bab61ae737f89033365fad2f9ee30d97344a01ade9b7",
    "simhash": "1:25558ea01c317e92",
    "word_count": 936
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:58:46.449655+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Independence County v. Duffey."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Battle, J.\nG. O. Duffey and others sought to quash an order of the Independence County Court, made on the 18th day of January, 1909, levying a tax or license fee on the public ferries of Independence County. The circuit court quashed the order, and the county appealed.\nThe grounds upon which the appellee asked the court to quash the order are as follows: First: \u201cThat said order and judgment * * * was rendered without notice to petitioners, and without giving them an opportunity to be present, or to be heard -in said matter;\u201d and, second, \u201cthat said county court had no jurisdiction to change, alter or levy the tax to be paid by petitioners for the privilege of operating such ferries, said ferries having been established and the annual tax therefor fixed by proper orders of court many years prior to the date of January 18, 1909; and in making said order of January \u2022 18, 1909, as aforesaid, said county court of Independence County assumed jurisdiction of the subject-matter without authority of law.\u201d\nThe statutes of this State do not sustain the contention of appellees. Section 3562 of Kirby\u2019s Digest provides: \u201cBefore any ferry shall be established, the court shall determine what tax shall be paid by such applicant for the privilege of such ferry, which shall not be less than $1 nor more than $100.\u201d And section 3566 of the same digest provides: \u201cUpon the payment of the tax levied by the county court -for the privilege of such ferry, and executing the bond required by law, such court shall grant a license to such applicant for the term of one year from the date of such license.\u201d\nSection 3570 provides: \u201cIt shall be the duty of the county, courts to levy a tax on all ferry privileges in their respective counties, whether application be made by any person for the same or not.\u201d\nSection 3571 provides: \u201cIt shall be the duty of the clerk of the county court, immediately after the assessment of any tax for ferry privileges by the court, to issue a license for the ferryman to whom such privileges were granted, and to deliver the same to the sheriff, and charge him with the amount thereof, in the same manner that he is required to be charged with other county -revenue.\u201d\nIn Murray v. Menefee, 20 Ark. 561, the court said: \u201cBy sections 7 (3561 of Kirby\u2019s Digest) and 11 (3566 of Kirby\u2019s Digest) it is provided that any person wishing to establish a ferry shall apply to the county court, and, on showing that he is in possession of the land where the ferry is sought to be established and that its establishment will promote the public convenience, the court shall grant him a license for the term of one year. When the license has been so granted, and the ferry once established, it is made the duty of the county court to levy a tax on the privilege annually thereafter, whether application for a renewal of the license be made or not; and the duty of the clerk to issue, annually, a license, and deliver it to the sheriff for the person to whom the privilege was granted, who, on presentation of the license, is bound 'to pay for it.\u201d Kirby\u2019s Digest, \u00a7 \u00a7 3570, 3571, 3572, 3573, 3574; Lindsay v. Lindley, 20 Ark. 573, 581.\nWhenever a license t\u00f3 operate a ferry is granted, it is the duty of the county court to levy a tax on such privilege annually thereafter, and the person to whom the privilege is granted must take notice of that fact and act accordingly. No additional notice is necessary or required in order to authorize the county court to make the levy.\nJudgment of circuit court reversed;.and judgment of county court affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Battle, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Sam. A. Moore, for appellant.",
      "McCaleb & Reeder, ior appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Independence County v. Duffey.\nOpinion delivered June 13, 1910.\nFerries \u2014 eevy of tax. \u2014 Under Kirby\u2019s Digest, \u00a7 3570 et seq., whenever a license to operate a ferry is granted, it is the duty of the county court to levy an annual tax on such privilege, without giving notice to the licensee.\nAppeal from Independence Circuit Court; Charles Coffin, Judge;\nreversed.\nSam. A. Moore, for appellant.\nAppellee failed to make his case. 72 Ark. 395; 30 Ark. 533; 58 Ark. 250; 21 Ark. 265. The writ should be issued and regularly returned. 33 Ark. 1x7; 58 Ark. 250. It must be addressed to the clerk. 21 Ark. 265; 58 Ark. 250. The circuit court could not look beyond the record certified. 18 Ark. 449; 25 Ark. 32; 23 Ark. 107. A statute should be construed with reference to its purpose and object. 71 Ark. 556. The words of a statute are to be given their obvious and natural meaning if possible. 67 Ark. 566. The intention of the law makers, when ascertained, should be followed. 65 Ark. 521; 69 Ark. 376. A license fee is a regulation, and not a tax. 56 Ark. 370.\nMcCaleb & Reeder, ior appellee.\nWhere the transcript fails to show a return of the writ, the presumption is that it was omitted by the clerk\u2019s neglect. 18 Ark. 449; 9 Ark. 535. It can not be contended here for the -first time that the copy of the order of the county court sought to be quashed is not a true and complete copy. 49 Ark. 253; 54 Ark. 216; 59 Ark. 312; 46 Ark. 96. This court has nothing to do with the wisdom or expediency of a statute. 70 Ark. 549. It does not sit to supervise legislation. 72 Ark. 195; 65 Ark. 559; 69 Ark. 521."
  },
  "file_name": "0352-01",
  "first_page_order": 376,
  "last_page_order": 378
}