{
  "id": 1224808,
  "name": "In re Friedman, Robert Mitchel",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Friedman",
  "decision_date": "2000-05",
  "docket_number": "MR 16711",
  "first_page": "710",
  "last_page": "710",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "189 Ill. 2d 710"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 61,
    "char_count": 655,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.884,
    "sha256": "e2abc199bf2d788e263a01c837ef3002066cc8386faf95261a1b5379ebe1489f",
    "simhash": "1:bb846532100f3bcc",
    "word_count": 104
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:37:47.405500+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re Friedman, Robert Mitchel"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Order of the Court:\nThe petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent Robert Mitchel Friedman, who has been disciplined in the State of Arizona, is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Illinois until he is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Arizona.\nRespondent Robert Mitchel Friedman shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re Friedman, Robert Mitchel\n(MR 16711)\nPhoenix, AZ"
  },
  "file_name": "0710-01",
  "first_page_order": 722,
  "last_page_order": 722
}