{
  "id": 725363,
  "name": "In re MYERS, JAMES WOODROW III",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Myers",
  "decision_date": "2001-05",
  "docket_number": "MR 17452",
  "first_page": "615",
  "last_page": "615",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "195 Ill. 2d 615"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 62,
    "char_count": 643,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.917,
    "sha256": "47fe5d078371807301a274e877774e836358aab6c71a90f01353629a2c242d3f",
    "simhash": "1:3bb069a2500f3f4d",
    "word_count": 104
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:27:15.890678+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re MYERS, JAMES WOODROW III"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Order of the Court:\nThe petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose reciprocal discipline pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 763 is allowed, and respondent James Woodrow Myers IR, who has been disciplined in the State of Indiana, is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Illinois until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Indiana.\nRespondent James Woodrow Myers III shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re MYERS, JAMES WOODROW III\n(MR 17452)\nValpariso, IN"
  },
  "file_name": "0615-01",
  "first_page_order": 629,
  "last_page_order": 629
}