{
  "id": 1477043,
  "name": "In re Kuhn, Carl Wehling",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Kuhn",
  "decision_date": "2002-09",
  "docket_number": "MR 18176",
  "first_page": "635",
  "last_page": "636",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "201 Ill. 2d 635"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 56,
    "char_count": 508,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.903,
    "sha256": "c37e6adbcfa529cb71a548d5256f450a4aa1cdd8afbf5927a541d817143a9cfd",
    "simhash": "1:5b344cb2140f308f",
    "word_count": 82
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:25:15.398056+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re Kuhn, Carl Wehling"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Order of the Court:\nThe petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Carl Wehling Kuhn is suspended from the practice of law for 60 days.\nRespondent Carl Wehling Kuhn shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Ghent Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re Kuhn, Carl Wehling\n(MR 18176)\nGlen Ellyn, EL"
  },
  "file_name": "0635-02",
  "first_page_order": 647,
  "last_page_order": 648
}