{
  "id": 8451200,
  "name": "COMMERCE BANK, Special Administrator of the Estate of Louise Osborn, Deceased, Appellant, v. YOUTH SERVICES OF MID-ILLINOIS, INC., a Not-for-profit Corporation, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Commerce Bank v. Youth Services of Mid-Illinois, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "2004-03-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 94830",
  "first_page": "188",
  "last_page": "189",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "211 Ill. 2d 188"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "60 Ill. 2d 529",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        5415194
      ],
      "year": 1975,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "530"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/60/0529-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1159,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.776,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20403737824097082
    },
    "sha256": "3c57a234b7f572e34dde3d16bce0cfbda8c06e10826cfc1d3805215c3ac1abd6",
    "simhash": "1:bb6c4496e49bbdd1",
    "word_count": 189
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:00:11.250886+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "COMMERCE BANK, Special Administrator of the Estate of Louise Osborn, Deceased, Appellant, v. YOUTH SERVICES OF MID-ILLINOIS, INC., a Not-for-profit Corporation, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER CURIAM:\nIn this case, one Justice of this Court has recused herself and the remaining members of the Court are divided so that it is not possible to secure the constitutionally required concurrence of four judges for a decision (see Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, \u00a7 3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The effect of this dismissal is the same as an affirmance by an equally divided court of the decision under review but is of no precedential value. See Perlman v. First National Bank, 60 Ill. 2d 529, 530 (1975).\nCARMAN, J., took no part.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER CURIAM:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Douglas N. Koth and Jason A. Cannell, of Koth & Cannell, PC., of Bloomington, and Alexandra de Saint Phalle, of Londrigan, Potter & Randle, PC., and William F. Trapp, of Brown, Hay & Stephens, of Springfield, for appellant.",
      "Esther Joy Schwartz, Patrick W Carlson and Donald E. Stellato, of Stellato & Schwartz, Ltd., of Chicago, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 94830.\nCOMMERCE BANK, Special Administrator of the Estate of Louise Osborn, Deceased, Appellant, v. YOUTH SERVICES OF MID-ILLINOIS, INC., a Not-for-profit Corporation, Appellee.\nOrder entered March 18, 2004.\nRehearing denied May 24, 2004.\nGARMAN, J., took no part.\nDouglas N. Koth and Jason A. Cannell, of Koth & Cannell, PC., of Bloomington, and Alexandra de Saint Phalle, of Londrigan, Potter & Randle, PC., and William F. Trapp, of Brown, Hay & Stephens, of Springfield, for appellant.\nEsther Joy Schwartz, Patrick W Carlson and Donald E. Stellato, of Stellato & Schwartz, Ltd., of Chicago, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0188-01",
  "first_page_order": 200,
  "last_page_order": 201
}