{
  "id": 3828308,
  "name": "In re DAVIS, Harold Thomas",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Davis",
  "decision_date": "2005-09",
  "docket_number": "MR 20296",
  "first_page": "744",
  "last_page": "744",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "216 Ill. 2d 744"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 66,
    "char_count": 600,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.89,
    "sha256": "293020e2b391e5f749aead394f4fa2939de979ca5db70e41bad2f7fa139e7d0a",
    "simhash": "1:fd1044651007b44b",
    "word_count": 96
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:30:48.226583+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re DAVIS, Harold Thomas"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Order of the Court:\nThe petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Harold Thomas Davis is suspended from the practice of law for 30 days and until he makes restitution of $750 to Eric Snap.\nSuspension effective October 17, 2005.\nRespondent Harold Thomas Davis shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re DAVIS, Harold Thomas\n(MR 20296)\nZion, IL"
  },
  "file_name": "0744-02",
  "first_page_order": 758,
  "last_page_order": 758
}