{
  "id": 3875537,
  "name": "In re SELTZER, Barry Michael",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Seltzer",
  "decision_date": "2005-11",
  "docket_number": "MR 20398",
  "first_page": "655",
  "last_page": "655",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "217 Ill. 2d 655"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 59,
    "char_count": 559,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.928,
    "sha256": "422547f5f19999ae2d1d43a7ccde44305b5b55a274d9d54d4a33a69827265b7f",
    "simhash": "1:7d906e36810f30c7",
    "word_count": 86
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:57:57.441611+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re SELTZER, Barry Michael"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Order of the Court:\nThe petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent Barry Michael Seltzer is suspended from the practice of law for 60 days.\nSuspension effective December 13, 2005.\nRespondent Barry Michael Seltzer shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re SELTZER, Barry Michael\n(MR 20398)\nSarasota, FL"
  },
  "file_name": "0655-01",
  "first_page_order": 669,
  "last_page_order": 669
}