{
  "id": 3875192,
  "name": "In re TUKESBREY, James Scot",
  "name_abbreviation": "In re Tukesbrey",
  "decision_date": "2005-11",
  "docket_number": "MR 20426",
  "first_page": "655",
  "last_page": "656",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "217 Ill. 2d 655"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 59,
    "char_count": 556,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.916,
    "sha256": "84b18154cff8f1544620a548b2455de7f440d6ed78c0ec01a8ff19732da8f502",
    "simhash": "1:3d326e53310ea6c6",
    "word_count": 86
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:57:57.441611+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In re TUKESBREY, James Scot"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Order of the Court:\nThe petition by the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission to impose discipline on consent pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 762(b) is allowed, and respondent James Scot Tukesbrey is suspended from the practice of law for 30 days.\nSuspension effective December 13, 2005.\nRespondent James Scot Tukesbrey shall reimburse the Disciplinary Fund for any Client Protection payments arising from his conduct prior to the termination of the period of suspension.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In re TUKESBREY, James Scot\n(MR 20426)\nWaukegan, IL"
  },
  "file_name": "0655-02",
  "first_page_order": 669,
  "last_page_order": 670
}