{
  "id": 1580160,
  "name": "People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry E. Neri, Defendant-Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Neri",
  "decision_date": "1970-03-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 53,290",
  "first_page": "78",
  "last_page": "79",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "123 Ill. App. 2d 78"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "410 F2d 468",
      "category": "reporters:federal",
      "reporter": "F.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2195427
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/f2d/410/0468-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1455,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.584,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.05918086344030096
    },
    "sha256": "cfdbf8d3a585cdd7abb25e0ec596405f3acc22f47ea65147a937cc5341303811",
    "simhash": "1:8b6af589787e4499",
    "word_count": 235
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:26:20.368977+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry E. Neri, Defendant-Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "MR. JUSTICE ENGLISH\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nThis is a quo warranta action brought in the name of the People of the State of Illinois by the State\u2019s Attorney of Cook County questioning defendant\u2019s right to hold office as Mayor of the City of Northlake. The sole ground alleged for defendant\u2019s disqualification was his conviction in the United State District Court of conspiracy to obstruct commerce by extortion. The Circuit Court, after hearing evidence and arguments of counsel, entered a judgment of ouster.\nOn appeal, defendant has raised .three points in his brief, but, by motion, has invited our attention to one of these as justifying a reversal by this court without proceeding further with the appeal. That proposition is that the judgment of the Circuit Court can no longer stand, since the District Court conviction has been remanded by the Court of Appeals for a new trial. United States v. Palermo, 410 F2d 468.\nThe State\u2019s Attorney has supplied no answer to this contention, and, indeed, we believe that it is unanswerable.\nAccordingly, the judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed.\nReversed.\nDRUCKER and LEIGHTON, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "MR. JUSTICE ENGLISH"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Maurice J. Walsh and Carl M. Walsh, of Chicago, for appellant.",
      "Edward V. Hanrahan, State\u2019s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry E. Neri, Defendant-Appellant.\nGen. No. 53,290.\nFirst District, Fourth Division.\nMarch 31, 1970.\nMaurice J. Walsh and Carl M. Walsh, of Chicago, for appellant.\nEdward V. Hanrahan, State\u2019s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0078-01",
  "first_page_order": 84,
  "last_page_order": 85
}