{
  "id": 2471109,
  "name": "Second Mercantile Financial Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold H. Rebeker et al., Defendants-Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Second Mercantile Financial Corp. v. Rebeker",
  "decision_date": "1971-06-04",
  "docket_number": "No. 55351",
  "first_page": "320",
  "last_page": "320",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "133 Ill. App. 2d 320"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "115 Ill.App. 12",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2546944
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/115/0012-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 128,
    "char_count": 1300,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.722,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08118311144781028
    },
    "sha256": "19da1daacb363bb924ec81b44a709b9719d4c4a0515ce48742465320d5a76646",
    "simhash": "1:0e3bd0d87d06cf37",
    "word_count": 210
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:40:15.946523+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Second Mercantile Financial Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold H. Rebeker et al., Defendants-Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. JUSTICE LORENZ\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nA folder containing papers purporting to be the record of an appeal from a \u201cjudgment order entered in this case on plaintiff\u2019s motion for summary judgment entered June 18, 1970, granting judgment in favor of plaintiff and against said defendants\u201d was filed with the Clerk of this court on September 17, 1970. On November 6, 1970, appellants abstract of record and brief and argument were filed. No appearance has been filed in this court on behalf of the appellee.\nUpon examination of the \u201crecord\u201d filed we find that it is without certification by the Clerk of the Circuit Court. Supreme Court Rule 324 provides that \u201c[t]he clerk of the trial court shall prepare, bind, and certify the record on appeal.\u201d The court stated in Hiser v. Baker (1904), 115 Ill.App. 12 at 13: \u201cRecords must be authenticated [citation] and, if not properly authenticated, appeals based thereon must be dismissed.\u201d\nFor lack of certification of the purported record the appeal is dismissed on motion of the court.\nAppeal dismissed.\nENGLISH, P. J., and DRUCKER, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. JUSTICE LORENZ"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Boyer & Durka, of Watseka, for appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Second Mercantile Financial Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold H. Rebeker et al., Defendants-Appellants.\n(No. 55351;\nFirst District\nJune 4, 1971.\nBoyer & Durka, of Watseka, for appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0320-01",
  "first_page_order": 342,
  "last_page_order": 342
}