{
  "id": 5174446,
  "name": "Spector Realty Company, Appellee, v. Ruth Brophy, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Spector Realty Co. v. Brophy",
  "decision_date": "1957-06-28",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 47,169",
  "first_page": "228",
  "last_page": "230",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "14 Ill. App. 2d 228"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "377 Ill. 384",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2544175
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/377/0384-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "415 Ill. 290",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2684422
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/415/0290-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "347 Ill. App. 547",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        5088721
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/347/0547-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "242 Ill. 50",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5653679
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/242/0050-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1397,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.556,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15600697183503748
    },
    "sha256": "3afa3ee069b1242eb99dee5b8c5322d976064e8fa294cd0edd0ab2606ce44757",
    "simhash": "1:3f977ee5a975a6ca",
    "word_count": 221
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:11:15.585812+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "FEINBERGr, J., concurs.",
      "LEWE, J., took no part."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Spector Realty Company, Appellee, v. Ruth Brophy, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PRESIDING JUSTICE KILEY\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nForcible detainer. Judgment for plaintiff in trial without jury. Questions raised on appeal by defendant : 1. Has plaintiff capacity to sue ? 2. Should judgment be reversed for court\u2019s alleged erroneous rulings on evidence or because judgment is against manifest weight of evidence?\nQuestion 1 \u2014 No merit. Point not made at trial and no reason for plaintiff to prove its corporate existence. (Commercial Trust Co. v. Mallers, 242 Ill. 50.) Point was raised by motion at trial in Vukovich v. Custer, 347 Ill. App. 547, reversed, 415 Ill. 290, cited by defendant, thus the case is inapplicable. Lewis v. West Side Trust & Savings Bank, 377 Ill. 384, is not in point.\nQuestion 2 \u2014 Unresponsive statements of defendant were properly stricken on objection. Only defense at trial was lack of statutory five day notice. Court finding that notice was served is not against manifest weight. No issue of rent tendered and refused raised or decided at trial. Defendant-appellant limited here to theory at trial.\nAffirmed.\nFEINBERGr, J., concurs.\nLEWE, J., took no part.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PRESIDING JUSTICE KILEY"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ruth Brophy, Pro Se, appellant.",
      "Aronson & Aronson (Leo E. Aronson and Max Chill, of counsel) for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Spector Realty Company, Appellee, v. Ruth Brophy, Appellant.\nGen. No. 47,169.\nFirst District, Second Division.\nJune 28, 1957.\nReleased for publication September 20, 1957.\nRuth Brophy, Pro Se, appellant.\nAronson & Aronson (Leo E. Aronson and Max Chill, of counsel) for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0228-01",
  "first_page_order": 238,
  "last_page_order": 240
}