{
  "id": 5800592,
  "name": "People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. William Augerbright, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Augerbright",
  "decision_date": "1964-11-28",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 64-56",
  "first_page": "444",
  "last_page": "445",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "53 Ill. App. 2d 444"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "194 NE2d 224",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "29 Ill2d 301",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2824109
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/29/0301-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1383,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.561,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.17047712048076935
    },
    "sha256": "3c1acc31c441e825e202c4ade59c9b0cd0c22b1235d6e8e637af1e53a7aaac44",
    "simhash": "1:0e422e37e9fe20b2",
    "word_count": 229
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:34:39.473137+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "CULBERTSON, P. J. and ROETH, J., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. William Augerbright, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "SCHEINEMAN, J.\nWilliam Augerbright filed a petition in this court for writ of error to review his conviction of burglary in the Circuit Court of LaSalle County. Since nothing was thereafter filed by the state\u2019s attorney within the time of the notice given him, this court ordered the writ to issue.\nSubsequently, the state\u2019s attorney filed a motion to vacate the order on the ground the petitioner had previously obtained a writ of error from the Supreme Court where the record was filed, counsel appointed, and the case was heard on briefs and oral argument. The judgment of conviction was affirmed, and the court filed an opinion, reported as People v. Augerbright, 29 Ill2d 301, 194 NE2d 224.\nThe foregoing decision has finally adjudicated petitioner\u2019s case, and he has no right to seek repeated reviews of his conviction.\nAccordingly, the motion by the state\u2019s attorney is allowed. The order previously entered in this court for writ of error is vacated, the writ is quashed, and the clerk of this court is directed to notify the trial court.\nWrit of error quashed.\nCULBERTSON, P. J. and ROETH, J., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "SCHEINEMAN, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William Augerbright, Pro se, plaintiff in error.",
      "Robert E. Richardson, State\u2019s Attorney, of Ottawa, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. William Augerbright, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 64-56.\nThird District.\nNovember 28, 1964.\nWilliam Augerbright, Pro se, plaintiff in error.\nRobert E. Richardson, State\u2019s Attorney, of Ottawa, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0444-01",
  "first_page_order": 456,
  "last_page_order": 457
}