{
  "id": 5281915,
  "name": "Adolph A. Rubinson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Morris Pancoe, et al., Defendants-Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rubinson v. Pancoe",
  "decision_date": "1964-12-02",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 49,923",
  "first_page": "224",
  "last_page": "226",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "54 Ill. App. 2d 224"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "148 NE2d 787",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "13 Ill2d 200",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2775022
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-2d/13/0200-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "19 NE2d 150",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "N.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "41 Ill App2d 122",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App. 2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2451637
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app-2d/41/0122-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 178,
    "char_count": 1756,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.525,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.0138298990704407e-07,
      "percentile": 0.9063263920020047
    },
    "sha256": "64d000a28aaef3f141b7e323639afb9a9652cc1329c83eff29df3b6f94ea4e38",
    "simhash": "1:ccf9d04d7d77c548",
    "word_count": 298
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:22.509094+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "DRUCKER and McCORMICK, JJ., concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "Adolph A. Rubinson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Morris Pancoe, et al., Defendants-Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE ENGLISH\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nPlaintiff\u2019s complaint consists of five counts, some in law and some in equity. The trial court entered an order as to Counts I and III dismissing them for want of equity. The same order made disposition of law Counts II and V by dismissing them and entering judgment thereunder in favor of defendants. It is from this order that plaintiff has sought to appeal.\nProm the record it appears that the trial court has made no disposition of Count IV of the complaint. It is, therefore, still pending, and the order which thus disposed of \u201cfewer than all the claims\u201d is not appealable without \u201can express finding that there is no just reason for delaying enforcement or appeal.\u201d Ill Rev Stats c 110, \u00a7 50(2). There is no such finding in the instant case.\nIn this situation we are without power to determine the appeal, and it is dismissed at appellant\u2019s costs. Cook County v. Hoytt, 41 Ill App2d 122, 19 NE2d 150; Ariola v. Nigro, 13 Ill2d 200, 148 NE2d 787.\nFaced with the prospect of this dismissal, appellant has made a motion for leave to withdraw the appeal. We are aware of no authority for such procedure, and the motion is denied. If, however, the subject matter of this appeal were to be properly presented for review by this court at a later date, the abstracts and briefs now on file could be employed in that appeal without reprint.\nAppeal dismissed.\nDRUCKER and McCORMICK, JJ., concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE ENGLISH"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Adolph Allen Rubinson & Associates, of Chicago (Norman Hanfling, Esq., of counsel), for appellant.",
      "Emmet Cleary, of Chicago, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Adolph A. Rubinson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Morris Pancoe, et al., Defendants-Appellees.\nGen. No. 49,923.\nFirst District, Fourth Division.\nDecember 2, 1964.\nAdolph Allen Rubinson & Associates, of Chicago (Norman Hanfling, Esq., of counsel), for appellant.\nEmmet Cleary, of Chicago, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0224-01",
  "first_page_order": 234,
  "last_page_order": 236
}